AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Wafa Yazigi

MATH450 · MATH425 · MATH25 · MATH115 · MATH420 · MATH2574078 · COLLEGEALGEBRA · MATH6532 · MATH410 · 71 lifetime ratings

AI rating
35/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
3.4

The decision

Take Wafa Yazigi only if you are already strong in math and can study independently every day.

Best fit · Self Taught ProFunny but polarizingFast pacedTest heavyLimited examplesStrict grading
  • Students split between appreciating his humor and structure and struggling with .
  • Many reviews say success requires strong prior math skills, daily practice, and outside help.
  • questions and little or no partial credit.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

An A is possible for prepared students, but most comments , and .

Online evidence suggests low effort, while in person evidence mostly says grades require strong math skills and steady practice.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The material often feels fast, under-explained, and difficult unless students already know the subject.

The single Online review found the course easy, but in person reviews repeatedly describe challenging pacing and concepts.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

35/100

as formally mandatory, but many students say skipping or falling behind makes passing unlikely.

Online evidence only mentions logging in and doing work, while in person reviews stress that .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

38/100

Students recommend him only for self-directed math students, while many .

Online evidence is positive, but the much larger in person record is sharply mixed with .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

partial credit and .

Format shift

and manageable, while in as unforgiving.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

Homework and daily practice are repeatedly described as .

Format shift

Online workload looked manageable in the one review, while in person students often described constant practice and homework.

Teaching experience

Poor

45/100

He is often described as funny and helpful, but many students say .

Format shift

Online teaching feedback is positive, but in and often negative for beginners.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

85/100

, and finals, with homework usually serving as practice or a small grade component.

Format shift

Both formats mention exams, but in person reviews give much stronger evidence of .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

49 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In person reviews are highly mixed, but repeated complaints , and needing prior math strength.

Main concern

Students without strong math background may feel lost and .

What students said

“ unless you already know the material.”
MATH25
“No partial credit at all.”
425
“to pass, you need to study every day.”
MATH450

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The only Online review is very positive and , and made the class manageable.

Main concern

The Online evidence is too limited to generalize beyond one positive review.

What students said

“All I had to do was log in and do the work.”
MATH420

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because many reviews describe difficult tests, limited partial credit, and grades driven by a few exams.

Test HeavyHard Exam VariationsNo Partial CreditMultiple Choice Final

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person reviews describe hard tests, no partial credit in some classes, and .

Hard TestsNo Partial CreditMultiple Choice FinalTwo Exams And Final
“No partial credit at all.”
425
“He only gives out 2 exams and the final.”
MATH25
“ .”
MATH450

Online

The single Online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam use, open-book status, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ unless you already know the material.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting repeated themes in teaching, exams, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“ ”

⚖️

25/100

“No partial credit at all.”

📚 Effort Required

35/100

“to pass, you need to study every day.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor has structure, hes detailed, and sticks to one subject at a time.
  • the book then goes over tons of problems.
  • He's just really vague.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • No partial credit at all.
  • This class is an easy A just focus and do the .

Theme 3

❤️ About Personality

  • He's a funny guy, however if you don't know the material you will not pass this class.
  • He cares about his students and helping them to understand the material.
  • He might make fun of you, just saying...

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

71

Lifetime ratings

90/100

Evidence confidence

The judgment is credible because 50 reviews span many years and repeatedly mention the same strengths and problems.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 515
4 out of 57
3 out of 519
2 out of 516
1 out of 514

Course coverage

MATH2521 reviews
MATH42510 reviews
MATH4209 reviews
4252 reviews
MATH4102 reviews
Show 5 more courses
MATH4502 reviews
COLLEGEALGEBRA1 review
MATH1151 review
MATH25740781 review
MATH65321 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

9 reported outcomes

A range

3

A+ 2 · A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

3

F 3

No letter grade reported

2

Incomplete 1 · Not_Sure_Yet 1