AI Rate Professor

Statistics

Stephen Johnson

STAT10 · STATS10 · MATH450 · MATH31 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
29/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
27.27%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Take Stephen Johnson only if you can handle a blunt teaching style, frequent studying, and learning independently.

Best fit · Self Taught ProCondescending ToneTough GraderLecture HeavySelf-Study NeededAttendance Critical
  • Reviews are sharply divided, but the dominant negative pattern is rude or condescending classroom behavior.
  • Several students say the course , and strong attendance.
  • A and fair structure, but .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

36/100

An A is possible, but students , and little grade flexibility.

The online review emphasizes strict grading, while , and studying are needed to survive.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

34/100

Statistics may be manageable for prepared students, but , and test-heavy expectations make the course feel challenging.

, while the single online review gives grading difficulty but little content detail.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

Multiple in-person reviews warn that skipping class will cause students to fall behind or fail.

In-person reviews repeatedly stress attendance, while the single .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

Most students do not recommend him because , and an uncomfortable learning environment.

The online review is negative about grading, and of positive defenders.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Students mention tough , and the need to pad grades with homework and quizzes.

Format shift

Online evidence is especially strict, while but still describe tough grading.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students report lots of , and a need to study consistently.

Format shift

In-person reviews provide most workload evidence, while the online .

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

Some students find his lectures clear, but repeated comments describe condescension, rushed teaching, and fear of asking questions.

Format shift

and are mixed but mostly negative, while the online review does not assess teaching depth.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Reviews repeatedly , and one dropped lowest exam.

Format shift

, while online assessment details are limited to makeup policy.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

10 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

mixed clarity but recurring complaints about condescension and discomfort asking questions.

Main concern

Students often feel rushed, judged, or forced to teach themselves.

What students said

“Course work is fine, but you will have to teach yourself or get a tutor.”
MATH450
“Never wanted to ask any .”
STAT10

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review is strongly negative and .

Main concern

No grade flexibility if you are near the next letter grade.

What students said

“He will not let you make up to try to raise your grade even if youre off a ”
STAT10

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams and quizzes appear central and demanding, but reviews do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, or closed-book rules.

Test HeavyLowest Exam DroppedQuizzesPop Quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and a dropped lowest exam, but they do not clearly prove closed-book rules or final format.

Test HeavyLowest Exam DroppedQuizzesPop Quizzes
“ so you will need to study.”
STATS10
“ .”
MATH31
“BEWARE OF POP QUIZZES”
STAT10

Online

The online review does not clearly prove webcam use, proctoring, Lockdown Browser, .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Course work is fine, but you will have to teach yourself or get a tutor.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

36/100

“Every class session is rushed.”

⚖️

25/100

“He will not let you make up to try to raise your grade even if youre off a ”

👍 Recommendation Rate

28/100

“ . ANYONE ELSE”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very rude, abrasive and condescending.
  • Makes you feel like an idiot if you have a question.
  • If you ask questions clearly, you get a .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • so you will need to study.
  • Definitely make sure you do the hw and quizzes so that it will pad your grade though.
  • .

Theme 3

🚪

  • I don't suggest missing ANY classes or you will get lost.
  • Course work is fine, but you will have to teach yourself or get a tutor.
  • Students who do not read ahead and show up to .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven reviews across several years provide detailed and mostly consistent concerns, though opinions are polarized.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 53
2 out of 51
1 out of 54

Course coverage

STAT105 reviews
STATS103 reviews
MATH4502 reviews
MATH311 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

7

Drop/Withdrawal 2 · Incomplete 1 · Not sure yet 2 · Rather not say 2