AI Rate Professor

Earth Science

Matthew Andreson

ESC13191 · ESC13171 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
72/100
RMP rating
3.5/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take Matthew Andreson if you are comfortable with and steady participation for .

Best fit · Effort For RewardFair GraderReading HeavyParticipation RequiredStraightforwardResponsive
  • Both reviews describe a straightforward course built around reading, quizzes, and weekly discussion participation.
  • Students say Matthew Andreson is fair, responsive, and .
  • Evidence is limited because and both are from the same date.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

A strong , and weekly participation, but the course is not described as effortless.

All ; there are zero online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

The material is presented clearly and feels straightforward, though students must read thoroughly and participate.

though the comments describe online-style coursework.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

30/100

Participation is required through discussion comments, so flexibility is .

Only in-person-counted reviews mention participation requirements; there are no online reviews to compare.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

because the course is fair, responsive, and straightforward.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

70/100

Students explicitly say he graded fairly and provided feedback, but .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

, and weekly forum discussion, which sounds steady but manageable.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Good

72/100

Students describe him as fair, responsive, and helpful, but there is little lecture-based teaching evidence.

Format shift

All , and one review notes no Zoom sessions or lectures.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

, and quizzes rather than major exams.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person-counted reviews describe a straightforward, reading-based earth science class with and .

Main concern

Participation and though the course feels fair.

What students said

“Participation is a must by leaving comments in discussion.”
ESC13171
“Everything was fairly straightforward. No complaints.”
ESC13191

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention quizzes but do not clearly prove exam .

QuizzesExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but they do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book rules, midterm format, or .

QuizzesExam Policy Not Clearly Proven
“Read the materials presented by professor and do the quiz.”
ESC13171

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Everything was fairly straightforward. No complaints.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

72/100

“ and graded fairly.”

📚 Workload Clarity

62/100

“The online class lab consisted of .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

76/100

“ .”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • Participation is a must by leaving comments in discussion.
  • The online class lab consisted of .
  • Read the materials presented by professor and do the quiz.

Theme 2

⚖️

  • The professor was fair and .
  • and graded fairly.

Theme 3

✅ About Course Experience

  • Everything was fairly straightforward. No complaints.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

, so the pattern is useful but limited.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ESC131711 review
ESC131911 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Not sure yet 2