AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Mark Merjil

CDE3 · CDE2 · CD4 · CDE6 · CDE1 · CDE4 · CDE5 · CD1 · 35 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
4.6/5
Take again
88%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

Take Mark Merjil if you want an and are willing to participate consistently.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyInspirationalParticipation-heavyGroup discussionEasy if engagedTransformative class
  • Students overwhelmingly describe him as inspirational, caring, and memorable.
  • Grades are usually strong when students participate, attend, read, and complete assignments.
  • The class is discussion-heavy and can be uncomfortable for shy students or students wanting traditional lectures.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

84/100

Most students earn high grades if they complete work, show up, and participate, but it is not a zero-effort A.

The online review calls assignments easy, while and attendance.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The material is approachable and discussion-based, though it asks students to reflect, read, and engage deeply.

Both formats describe accessible work, with and personal reflection.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Attendance and participation repeatedly affect grades, and several students warn that skipping class is a serious problem.

, while the online review does not clearly discuss attendance.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

94/100

Students strongly recommend him because the class feels inspiring, personal, and .

Both formats are positive, with much stronger confidence from the large in-person review set.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

82/100

and forgiving when students complete assignments and participate.

Format shift

The online review explicitly says grading criteria are not strict, while and effort-based grades.

Workload

Moderate

56/100

The workload , and participation, but most students say it is manageable.

Format shift

Both formats mention many assignments, with in-person reviews adding group work and attendance demands.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students repeatedly describe him as inspiring, caring, engaging, and one of .

Format shift

Online and reviews providing broad and consistent support.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Assessment appears , and group work rather than exams.

Format shift

Both formats emphasize assignments and participation, with .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

34 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

In-person reviews strongly , and personal impact while stressing participation and attendance.

Main concern

Students who dislike speaking, group work, or .

What students said

“Do the and show up to class and you'll do fine.”
CDE4
“Hands down the .”
CD4

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The only online review is extremely positive but and deep reflection.

Main concern

There are a lot of assignments even though .

What students said

“There are a lot of assignments but so easy.”
CDE4
“You really have to dig deep in this class but you come out a better person because of it!”
CDE4

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove a consistent exam format, proctoring policy, .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and group work, and do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, proctoring, midterm, or final policies.

Online

The online review mentions assignments but does not clearly prove webcam, proctoring, .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I can not tell ! I honestly would take every class with him if I could.”

Voice snapshots generated from 35 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, participation, and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“Hands down the .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

94/100

“ be prepared to have a lot of homework.”

📈 Grade Value

84/100

“I loved his class--an easy A if you apply yourself and participate.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Merjil is truly inspiring!
  • His teaching style is very good and helps you understand the lesson very well.
  • He teaches from real life aspects which made it easy for me to relate and understand.

Theme 2

🗣️ About Participation

  • Be ready to participate.
  • as like all other classes.
  • If you are shy, you may want to rethink taking his class as he expects large group conversations.

Theme 3

📈 About Work & Grades

  • There are a lot of assignments but so easy.
  • Do the and show up to class and you'll do fine.
  • You have to work for it

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

35

Recent reviews read by the AI

35

Lifetime ratings

91/100

Evidence confidence

Thirty-five reviews across years show very consistent praise, high grades, and repeated participation warnings, with only one online review.

Inside 35 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 529
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CDE211 reviews
CDE410 reviews
CDE68 reviews
CDE52 reviews
CD11 review
Show 3 more courses
CD41 review
CDE11 review
CDE31 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

28 reported outcomes

A range

24

A+ 8 · A 14 · A- 2

B range

3

B+ 3

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1