AI Rate Professor

Art

Oliver Sutter

ART10 · ART14 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
78/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
60%
Difficulty
2.8

The decision

if and can keep up with projects and critiques.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful feedbackCaringProject heavyParticipation mattersFlexible materials
  • Students praise Sutter for and genuine care.
  • The class can require many projects, critiques, and .
  • Grades are possible with effort, progress, and participation, but it is not a low-effort A.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

60/100

A grades are common in the sample, but students repeatedly say the grade , and progress.

All evidence comes from in person reviews; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The art concepts are manageable, but fast-track pacing, critiques, and .

All course difficulty evidence comes from in person reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

Critiques and staying through class appear important, and students warn that leaving early hurts the experience.

Only in .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

68/100

, but workload complaints and two negative recommendations lower confidence.

The recommendation evidence is entirely from in person reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

56/100

and progress rather than automatic high marks.

Format shift

Only in .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

, and projects, especially in ART14.

Format shift

All workload evidence is from in person reviews.

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

, and enthusiasm, even when they criticize the workload.

Format shift

Teaching evidence comes only from in person reviews.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

, and participation rather than exams.

Format shift

Only in person reviews describe assessment methods.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In person reviews describe a caring and , but , and participation pressure.

Main concern

Workload and .

What students said

“He walks around the room to look at everyone's work and .”
ART14
“Honestly thought this class would be a breeze.”
ART14
“This prof. makes you EARN your grade.”
ART14

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove an .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In person reviews do not clearly prove any exam format, webcam .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He walks around the room to look at everyone's work and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

80/100

“Super understanding, super flexible, genuinely cares about the wellbeing of his students during this time.”

📚 Workload Reality

30/100

“Sutter Gives out a lot of hw assignments usually 2-4 pages long, 6 critique assignments (final included), not really an easy A class.”

⚖️

56/100

“Grades you on effort and progress.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He walks around the room to look at everyone's work and .
  • He would always go the extra mile because he loves what he does.

Theme 2

📈 About Workload & Grades

  • This prof. makes you EARN your grade.
  • Our abstract project was 12 pages long and he only gave us a week to finish.
  • Honestly thought this class would be a breeze.

Theme 3

🧑‍🎨 About Participation

  • Don't miss a critique (very important) and !
  • He gets mad if you leave class early...

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Five detailed and workload, but the sample is small and older.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 51
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ART144 reviews
ART101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

5

A+ 1 · A 3 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values