AI Rate Professor

Design

Alejandra Parise

CHCM203 · FASHD20 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
8/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid unless and largely teach yourself.

Best fit · Self Taught ProStrict attendancePoor organizationSelf-teaching requiredConfusing lecturesNice but ineffective
  • Students describe unclear classes and poorly written materials.
  • though students say class time is not useful.
  • Both reviews strongly discourage taking her despite .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

25/100

Getting an A appears difficult because students report confusion, strict attendance, and fear of .

.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The content is because lectures, notes, and organization are described as unclear.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

5/100

absence mentioned.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

because the , and attendance-heavy.

.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

There is , but and fear of not passing suggest a low-forgiveness course.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students report needing to teach themselves outside class, which raises the real workload.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

15/100

, and serious disorganization.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews mention participation and group projects but .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are consistently negative, citing strict attendance, confusion, poor notes, and disorganization.

Main concern

Students feel forced to attend classes that do not help them learn.

What students said

“ !”
FASHD20
“Her powerpoints and notes are poorly written.”
CHCM203

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam policy

Assessment risk

Varies

40/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format, proctoring, or book policy.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam policy

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I basically go home and with the so there's no reason why I should be there every time no matter what......”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and attendance. Credibility rating: Low.

📉 Teaching Quality

15/100

“Her powerpoints and notes are poorly written.”

🚫 Recommendation Risk

5/100

“She's very sweet and nice, but no.”

📌

5/100

“She only gives you 1 unexcused absence.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • I don't even understand what's going on during her classes
  • Her powerpoints and notes are poorly written.
  • and bad with her time.

Theme 2

📌

  • !
  • She only gives you 1 unexcused absence. ONE!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

, but their complaints are consistent and specific.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CHCM2031 review
FASHD201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values