AI Rate Professor

Statistics

Octavio Chairez

STAT10 · MATH425 · MATH25 · MATH420 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
3/100
RMP rating
1.2/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.6

The decision

unless you can teach yourself and handle very difficult, poorly aligned assessments.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing lecturesTests do not match homeworkTough graderHeavy workloadPoor support
  • , and .
  • , and weak answers to questions.
  • Grades appear hard to earn, with , and little confidence from students.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

8/100

Getting an A appears very difficult because students report , and assessments that do not match instruction.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

12/100

The course feels much harder because students say , and disconnected from tests.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , though lectures are central and often criticized as low value.

Only in-person reviews mention classroom experience, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

3/100

Students strongly discourage taking him because they , and little useful help.

The recommendation and is consistently negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

8/100

Grades appear harsh because , and a low class average.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

20/100

Workload is heavy because multiple reviews mention lots of , and online assignments with poor alignment.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

5/100

Teaching quality is rated very poorly because students describe unclear lectures, frequent mistakes, poor answers, and weak support.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Assessment and tests, but students emphasize that and poorly aligned.

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are overwhelmingly negative, , and poor support.

Main concern

Students say they must teach themselves because lectures and .

What students said

“Homework did not align with the .”
STAT10
“ ”
MATH25
“At the start of the semester there was about 40 of us. Now there is about 12.”
MATH25

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe very hard tests that often do not match homework or lectures, but they .

Hard TestsTests Do Not Match HomeworkUnclear Exam Preparation

Assessment risk

Strict

10/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but do not clearly prove closed-book rules, proctoring, or .

Hard TestsTests Do Not Match HomeworkUnclear Exam Preparation
“ you study.”
MATH25
“when i got the those problems came from!”
MATH425

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Homework did not align with the .”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and student outcomes. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

5/100

“he DOES NOT teach.”

⚖️

8/100

“The class average was 65.”

🚫 Recommendation

3/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is so unclear, makes mistakes in class, forgets things too easily, and taught in class.
  • He practically teaches himself as he goes along.
  • he photocopied the book just read it aloud during class.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • you study.
  • The class average was 65.
  • Messed up my gpa pretty bad because of him.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Experience

  • At the start of the semester there was about 40 of us. Now there is about 12.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven reviews across many years are detailed and highly consistent, though some are older.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 58

Course coverage

MATH256 reviews
MATH4252 reviews
STAT102 reviews
MATH4201 review

Reported outcomes

D range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

2

D 2

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

2

Drop/Withdrawal 2