AI Rate Professor

Biology

Ayesha Tariq

BIO22 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
5/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

unless you are prepared for a disorganized, high-stress Biology course with little student support.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerDisorganizedTough GraderTest HeavyUnapproachableOverwhelming
  • Students consistently describe the class as , and harder than necessary.
  • All reviews are in person and strongly advise avoiding the professor.
  • Grades appear difficult because exams, pop quizzes, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

5/100

Getting an A appears very difficult because students report , and low grades.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

10/100

The course content is described as hard physiology and .

All difficulty evidence comes from in-person BIO22 reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

45/100

Reviews do not clearly state an , so flexibility is not proven.

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

0/100

Students unanimously and advise choosing someone else.

All recommendation evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online comparison.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

5/100

Students repeatedly label her a and say mood and confusion could affect grades.

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

10/100

Students describe the class as stressful, test-heavy, pop-quiz-heavy, and overwhelming.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Awful

10/100

Students describe the professor as , and ineffective at explaining complicated material.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

90/100

Tags and and tough grading.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are uniformly negative, , and a tense classroom tone.

Main concern

Students felt the professor made and stressful.

What students said

“Very bad professor.”
BIO22
“DO NOT.”
BIO22
“ .”
BIO22

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The reviews support a and pop quizzes, but do not prove proctoring or book policy.

Test HeavyPop QuizzesTough Grading

Assessment risk

Strict

15/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and pop quizzes but do not clearly prove exam format, book policy, or proctoring.

Test HeavyPop QuizzesTough Grading
“Very hard concepts to grasp on your own”
BIO22
“Beware of pop quizzes”
BIO22
“ ”
BIO22

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and stress. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

10/100

“She is a and many people were struggling in this class.”

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

0/100

“I would definitely suggest taking someone else so you have a chance.”

📈 Difficulty & Grades

5/100

“Very hard concepts to grasp on your own”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She made me doubt my ability to comprehend the subject.
  • She adjusted the syllabus multiple times throughout the semester and made the class complicated for no reason.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Very hard concepts to grasp on your own
  • She was very moody and that would in turn impact your grade.

Theme 3

🚫 About Recommendation

  • DO NOT.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

65/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because only three older reviews exist, but they are detailed and highly consistent.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

BIO223 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values