AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Camelia Cretu

STAT10 · MATH410 · MATH510 · MATH450 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
17/100
RMP rating
2.3/5
Take again
25%
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

Avoid her for in-person math unless , and actively ask questions.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing LecturesHeavy HomeworkDisorganized SyllabusThick AccentHelpful If Asked
  • Most in-person students describe the class as , and stressful.
  • , but keeping up can make passing possible.
  • The one online review is much more positive than the in-person reviews, mainly because asking questions helped.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

Good grades are possible only with , and keeping up with .

The online review suggests passing is manageable with questions, while and confusion.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The material feels difficult because lectures are , the , and students report widespread confusion.

Online evidence is more manageable, but .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

One in-person tag says skipping class means you will not pass, and another review says coming to class is needed to do well.

, while the online review does not clearly prove an attendance policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

Most students would not recommend her because , and the class disorganized.

The only online review is positive, but the .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

The reviews , but students describe high effort, stress, and uncertainty about passing.

Format shift

Online grading seems manageable, while because students are confused.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Multiple reviews mention lots of and adds stress.

Format shift

Both online and in-person reviews mention online homework, with in-person comments sounding more burdensome.

Teaching experience

Poor

30/100

Most reviews criticize unclear explanations, disorganization, a hard-to-follow accent, and students being lost.

Format shift

The online review is relatively positive, but .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Homework, Aleks, class work, and .

Format shift

Online evidence emphasizes Aleks homework and tests, while and class work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, citing , and stress.

Main concern

Students report being lost because , and .

What students said

“most of my classmates are just as lost as I am and the ”
MATH450
“ .”
MATH410
“There is a lot of and takes time but as long as you keep up it isn't too difficult.”
STAT10

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The single online student passed by asking many questions and .

Main concern

and the .

What students said

“I asked lots of questions when I didnt understand and .”
MATH510

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Tests are mentioned, but reviews do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book status, webcam use, Lockdown Browser, or .

Tests MentionedReviews Do Not Clearly Prove ProctoringReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Open Book

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention class work and passing concerns but .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy
“Never collects anything except class work.”
MATH410
“Not sure if I will pass this class and am very stressed out and considering dropping!”
MATH450

Online

The online review mentions passing every test but does not clearly prove .

Tests MentionedReviews Do Not Clearly Prove Proctoring
“ .”
MATH510

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ . Writes problems on the board and expects you to know how to figure it out on your own.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

30/100

“ .”

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“There is a lot of and takes time but as long as you keep up it isn't too difficult.”

👍 Recommendation Risk

30/100

“ !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very soft spoken, was hard to hear at the back of classroom, and a thick accent, that can be .
  • .
  • Her accent is thick but I could still understand her.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Workload

  • There is a lot of and takes time but as long as you keep up it isn't too difficult.
  • most of my classmates are just as lost as I am and the
  • .

Theme 3

🧭 About Class Fit

  • As long as you come to class and ask .
  • I asked lots of questions when I didnt understand and .
  • Save yourself the headache.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

70/100

Evidence confidence

Four reviews include detailed and mostly consistent complaints, but the small sample and one positive online review limit certainty.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH4101 review
MATH4501 review
MATH5101 review
STAT101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1