AI Rate Professor

Anthropology

Billy Wong

ANTHR1 · ANTHRO1 · ANTHRO1L · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
59/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Take Wong if you will attend class and read consistently, but if long lectures and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardLecture HeavyAttendance MattersReading RequiredHard ExamsInteresting Lectures
  • Student experiences are split, with two strong positive reviews and one strongly negative review.
  • Success depends heavily on attending lectures and keeping up with readings.
  • Exams and - and reading-based, with some students finding them easy and one finding them very hard.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

57/100

An A is possible with attendance and reading, but and missed in-class work can quickly damage the grade.

All evidence is from in-person classes, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The lab sounds easy, but the lecture course , and a final.

, and there is no online evidence.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Multiple reviews warn that skipping class leads to missed material, missed work, or poor performance.

.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

64/100

Most students recommend him if you attend and read, but one student because lectures are boring and exams are hard.

Recommendation evidence is entirely in person and noticeably mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

Grades seem tied to attendance, reading, quizzes, and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

The , but the and exam preparation.

Format shift

workload.

Teaching experience

Average

67/100

Two students liked his teaching and lectures, while one found the lectures long, boring, and disengaging.

Format shift

All teaching evidence is in person and mixed across course types.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Reviews mention weekly quizzes, two midterms, a final, and .

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

and reading strongly affect grades, with sharply mixed reactions to lecture quality.

Main concern

Skipping class or avoiding the and quiz performance.

What students said

“His lectures are LONG and extremely boring.”
ANTHRO1
“If .”
ANTHR1
“if the work and it will affect your grade.”
ANTHRO1L

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The exams and evidence of open-book, proctoring, webcam, or closed-book rules.

Weekly QuizzesTwo MidtermsFinalLecture-Based ExamsReading-Based Quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

46/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

midterms, and a final, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or proctoring rules.

Weekly QuizzesTwo MidtermsFinalLecture-Based ExamsReading-Based Quizzes
“ .”
ANTHRO1
“Two mid terms and so try not to miss.”
ANTHR1
“ and .”
ANTHRO1L

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

67/100

“He is a great teacher and lectures were interesting.”

📚 Attendance And Reading

18/100

“Skip class? You won't pass.”

🧪

46/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Lectures

  • His lectures are LONG and extremely boring.
  • lectures were interesting.
  • Overall easy class, and really interesting lectures!

Theme 2

📈 About Grades

  • If .
  • if the work and it will affect your grade.
  • Two mid terms and so try not to miss.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

63/100

Evidence confidence

Three detailed in-person reviews cover different course experiences but show conflicting opinions.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ANTHR11 review
ANTHRO11 review
ANTHRO1L1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

3 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1