AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Linda Krajewski

PYCH25 · PSYCH93207 · PSYCH1 · PSYCH25 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
25/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
16.67%
Difficulty
3.7

The decision

Avoid her unless you are and handling frequent online work and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProReads from slidesTest heavyHard examsHeavy Moodle workLow engagement
  • Most students criticize the teaching style as .
  • The workload and assessment load feel heavier than expected, with , and difficult tests.
  • and , but the overall experience is still viewed negatively.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

An A is possible only with because tests are described as hard, long, and .

and busy work, while the single online review only supports low engagement.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

36/100

The course is harder than expected because , and students often feel unsupported.

, while online evidence is too thin to judge content difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

55/100

because one student skipped without issue, while others mention signing out at the end of class.

, and it is mixed.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

24/100

Most students do not recommend her because , and excessive busy work.

Both online and in-person evidence are negative, but .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

32/100

because tests are hard and frequent, though some homework and papers are described as .

Format shift

; the online review does not discuss grading.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Workload is heavy due , and multiple exams.

Format shift

Workload complaints come from in-person reviews, with .

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

Teaching quality is poor because students , and leaves them to teach themselves.

Format shift

Online and in-person reviews both mention low engagement, but .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

, and tests repeatedly emphasized over other work.

Format shift

; the online review does not describe assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews commonly describe slide , and poor engagement.

Main concern

Students often feel they must teach themselves while and busy work.

What students said

“All she does .”
PSYCH1
“you might as well teach your self.”
PSYCH93207
“She assigns a lot of busy work on Moodle”
PSYCH25

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single online review only says she did not engage students, so online evidence is very limited.

Main concern

Low student engagement is the .

What students said

“She didn't engage her students”
PSYCH25

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

but mostly standard to demanding, with hard and and one cheat-sheet mention.

Long QuizzesHard TestsQuiz Questions ReusedOne Page Cheat SheetMidterm And Final

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention easy but and , and one allowed cheat sheet.

Long QuizzesHard TestsQuiz Questions ReusedOne Page Cheat SheetMidterm And Final
“Quizes are easy but long.”
PYCH25
“She allows one page "cheat .”
PSYCH25
“ and lengthy and there are no study guides given.”
PSYCH1

Online

The online review does .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You might as well stay home and teach yourself because that how it's gonna feel like when being in her class.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“All she does .”

⚠️ Recommendation Risk

24/100

“ ? DONT WITH HER!”

🧪

45/100

“ and lengthy and there are no study guides given.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She didn't engage her students
  • she .
  • She does not engage her students at all.

Theme 2

🧪 About Tests

  • Quizes are easy but long.
  • and lengthy and there are no study guides given.
  • midterm and because they are the .

Theme 3

📚 About Workload

  • .
  • She assigns a lot of busy work on Moodle
  • each week you go through a chapter and after your done you have a 50 question test on any little thing.

Theme 4

📉 About Self-Teaching

  • you can pretty much teach yourself at home cause she reads word from word on the slides.
  • you might as well teach your self.
  • Read the book because you'll find no help from her or her lectures.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

76/100

Evidence confidence

Eight reviews provide consistent negative themes, but online evidence is only one vague review and several reviews are older.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 54
2 out of 51
1 out of 53

Course coverage

PSYCH255 reviews
PSYCH11 review
PSYCH932071 review
PYCH251 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

3

B+ 2 · B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

1

Audit/No Grade 1