AI Rate Professor

Reading

Judith Weingartner

ENG475 · READ6420 · READ550 · READ0000 · READ7130 · READ530 · READ5286 · ENG495 · ENGLISH475 · READING550 · ENG575 · RWEAD550 · READ450 · 39 lifetime ratings

AI rating
26/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

Avoid her unless , and have no better section available.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerVery UnorganizedTough GraderHeavy WorkloadConfusing InstructionsCaring But Frustrating
  • Many students describe , and delayed or inconsistent grading.
  • A few students say she is kind and helpful when asked, but the negative pattern is much stronger.
  • Getting a good grade usually requires , and doing substantial homework or DLA work.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

An A is possible only if students , and carefully protect proof of submitted work.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The material itself is not always described as hard, but and poor organization make the course feel much harder.

All .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

as essential, and students say skipping or falling behind makes passing difficult.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

Most students do not recommend her because , and workload outweigh her kindness.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

18/100

Students repeatedly report tough, inconsistent, or very low grades.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Many reviews mention lots of , and busy work.

Format shift

The workload pattern .

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

She is often described as nice, but students , and unclear in class.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

Reviews mention a mix of essays, , and finals.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

39 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mostly negative, with repeated complaints about , and confusing expectations.

Main concern

and lost work create avoidable stress.

What students said

“ . .”
ENG475
“She gives a ton of work and the !”
READ550
“If you do all of the homework and DLA's and workshops and B the A in the class.”
READ550

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention long tests and mismatched expectations, but they do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, proctoring, or webcam rules.

Long TestsTests May Not Match ExpectationsStudy Required

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and finals but do not clearly prove book policy or .

Long TestsFinal MentionedStudy Required
“The so study and come prepared”
READ550
“ to be”
READ550
“the two weeks before and the final as well.”
ENG475

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ but really hard and doesn't seem to care.”

Voice snapshots generated from 39 reviews, highlighting recurring themes in , and workload. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

34/100

“ and .”

⚖️

18/100

“I was supposed to have a B+ and somehow left with a C.”

📚 Workload Pressure

24/100

“She gives a ton of work and the !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She is just terrible at teaching.
  • She is a nice lady but .
  • She truly cares about her students and their success.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • Grades hard on all the assignments and DLA's doesnt keep track of papers and .
  • If you do all of the homework and DLA's and workshops and B the A in the class.

Theme 3

🧾 About Organization

  • She lost a couple of my papers.
  • Most of the time i didn't even know what the .
  • She would hand back grading sheets that .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

39

Recent reviews read by the AI

39

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

The analysis is based on 39 reviews across many years with a consistent pattern of detailed complaints and some positive counterpoints.

Inside 39 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 55
3 out of 56
2 out of 511
1 out of 59

Course coverage

READ55016 reviews
READ5307 reviews
ENGLISH4754 reviews
ENG4752 reviews
4751 review
Show 9 more courses
ENG4951 review
ENG5751 review
READ00001 review
READ4501 review
READ52861 review
READ64201 review
READ71301 review
READING5501 review
RWEAD5501 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values