AI Rate Professor

Culinary Arts

Andrew Feldman

CUL444 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
92/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

if you want a positive, hands-on culinary class with a respected new instructor.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyRespectedInspirationalStrong First SemesterHands-On RecipesCould Do More
  • Students saw him as effective and inspiring in his first semester.
  • The course had enjoyable hands-on recipe work.
  • The main limitation was that students wanted more class activities.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

82/100

The A+ and positive tone suggest the , though the review does not call it effortless.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The content appears approachable, and the professor may adjust because he was unsure how advanced the class was.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review .

Evidence comes only from one in-person review, with .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

Recommended because the instructor did a great job and the hands-on work was enjoyable.

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

80/100

The A+ supports lenient grading, but the .

Format shift

Evidence .

Workload

Light

78/100

The student wished they did more, suggesting the workload was not heavy.

Format shift

Evidence .

Teaching experience

Excellent

90/100

The review says he did a great job and presents him as respected and inspirational.

Format shift

Evidence .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Evidence centers on in-class recipes and hands-on work, with .

Format shift

Evidence .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The in-person class is positive and hands-on, with some room for more advanced pacing.

Main concern

The class may feel lighter or less advanced than some students want.

What students said

“He has done a great job.”
CUL444
“All the recipes that we did in class were all delicious”
CUL444
“I just wish we did more.”
CUL444

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove any .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format or .

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“He has done a great job.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching, activities, and course level. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

90/100

“He has done a great job.”

🍽️ Hands-On Learning

78/100

“All the recipes that we did in class were all delicious”

📈 Course Depth

72/100

“I just wish we did more.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • This was the first semester Chef Feldman has taught at Chaffey.
  • He has done a great job.

Theme 2

🍽️ About Class Activities

  • All the recipes that we did in class were all delicious
  • I just wish we did more.

Theme 3

📈 About Course Level

  • Since it is his first year, and not knowing how advance our class was, he may change it up.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

34/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there is only one older review, even though it contains useful classroom details.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

CUL4441 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A+ 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values