AI Rate Professor

Science

Angela Aranda

ESC1 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
31/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Avoid unless you are comfortable teaching yourself from limited materials and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProFast LecturesGroup PresentationsUnclear HomeworkLimited Materials
  • The only review describes rushed lectures and .
  • because work may not be collected but can still receive zeros.
  • The student earned an A but would not take the professor again, signaling poor experience despite possible grade success.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

An A is possible, but and self-teaching reduce the grade comfort.

The only , so confidence is limited.

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The content feels harder than it should because lectures are rushed and students may need to research topics themselves.

Only .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review .

There is no online evidence, and the .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

22/100

The because instruction and homework expectations were frustrating.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Grading seems unforgiving because are unclear.

Format shift

This and should be treated cautiously.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

The workload does not sound huge, but , and self-research add effort.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

38/100

Teaching quality is weak because lectures are rushed and students are left to fill knowledge gaps themselves.

Format shift

The teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

The review emphasizes group presentations and .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single in-person review describes rushed lectures, group presentations, and .

Main concern

Students may need to look up material independently because lectures and resources are not detailed enough.

What students said

“She speeds through her lectures then tells you to get in groups to present”
ESC1
“you have to look up info on your phone”
ESC1
“Wont ask to collect HW but will give you a zero if you dont.”
ESC1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The testing policy.

No Clear Exam Evidence

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She speeds through her lectures then tells you to get in groups to present, nothing detailed/long but you wont know the subject she gives you well enough”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching clarity and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

38/100

“She speeds through her lectures then tells you to get in groups to present”

⚖️

35/100

“Wont ask to collect HW but will give you a zero if you dont.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

22/100

“ . i guess”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She speeds through her lectures then tells you to get in groups to present
  • nothing detailed/long but you wont know the subject she gives you well enough

Theme 2

📚 About Materials And Homework

  • b/c theres no book, only a workbook, you have to look up info on your phone.
  • Wont ask to collect HW but will give you a zero if you dont.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

22/100

Evidence confidence

, so the pattern is weak even though the comment is specific.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ESC11 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values