AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Robert Mittendorf

PHILO70 · PHIL87153 · PHIL70INTRO · PHIL73 · PHIL7085514 · PHIL191 · PHIL76 · PHIL70 · PHIL91023 · PHIL7087184 · 115 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
95.65%
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

if you want an engaging philosophy class where steady participation and .

Best fit · Effort For RewardClear engaging lecturesHelpful paper feedbackParticipation mattersManageable reading workloadVery lenient grading
  • Students overwhelmingly praise his lectures, patience, and ability to make philosophy understandable.
  • Grades are very attainable if students , and write the papers.
  • The course uses papers, readings, and participation .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

An A is very realistic because and assignments are manageable, but students still need to attend, participate, read, and write papers.

The Easy A evidence is almost entirely from in-person reviews, with only one vague online review.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

Philosophy readings and critical thinking can be challenging, but .

In-person reviews repeatedly describe difficult readings made clearer by lecture, while the online review gives no detail.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

25/100

as formally required, but many students say skipping class hurts participation, understanding, and grades.

Attendance expectations are strongly supported by in-person reviews, while the online .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

97/100

Students strongly recommend him because , and fair with grading.

The recommendation evidence is overwhelmingly in-person, with the only online review also positive but too brief.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

91/100

Many students earned A grades and , and fair grading.

Format shift

, while the online review only reports a C without grading detail.

Workload

Moderate

66/100

The and papers, but most students call it manageable if they keep up.

Format shift

, and papers, while the online review gives no workload detail.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students consistently describe him as , and able to make philosophy interesting.

Format shift

In-person evidence is very strong and detailed, while the online review is positive but brief.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Grades appear , and presentations rather than traditional exams.

Format shift

and homework, while the online review gives no assessment detail.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

49 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person students describe him as , and very rewarding for students who attend and do the work.

Main concern

, and .

What students said

“Just go to class, participate and do the and you'll pass easily.”
PHIL70
“I barely put effort in this class and passed with an A+.”
PHIL73

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The single online and understanding, but gives little detail.

Main concern

Online evidence is too limited to judge workload or .

What students said

“Great teacher very helpful and understanding”
PHIL70INTRO

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The course usually replaces traditional exams with papers and .

No Tests In Some SectionsMidterm PaperFinal PaperWeekly HomeworkClear Paper Guidelines

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

86/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews often describe midterm and evidence of proctoring rules.

Midterm PaperFinal PaperNo Tests In Some SectionsPaper-Based Assessment
“There are , and a few presentations.”
PHIL76
“2 essays that count for .”
PHIL70

Online

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Just go to class, participate and do the and you'll pass easily.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and attendance. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“His lectures are great, during that time he clears up any confusion you had during the reading and he .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

97/100

“ . Take any philosophy class with him and you'll love it.”

⚖️

91/100

“Grading scale was very fair including .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He knows what he's talking about and he keeps students engaged.
  • He transformed this complex subject into something interesting and thought provoking.
  • He is very easy to talk to and helps whenever you ask for it.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Just go to class, participate and do the and you'll pass easily.
  • I barely put effort in this class and passed with an A+.
  • The and confusing

Theme 3

📝

  • Have to attend class. , and .
  • but it is easy .
  • Show up or you will not pass

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

115

Lifetime ratings

94/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews over several years are detailed, consistent, and strongly aligned , and grading.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 5104
4 out of 511
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHIL7039 reviews
PHIL70INTRO2 reviews
PHIL762 reviews
PHIL1911 review
PHIL70855141 review
Show 5 more courses
PHIL70871841 review
PHIL731 review
PHIL871531 review
PHIL910231 review
PHILO701 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

41 reported outcomes

A range

29

A+ 5 · A 21 · A- 3

B range

8

B+ 3 · B 3 · B- 2

C range

2

C+ 1 · C 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1