AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Tim Arner

MATHLAB · 510AND520 · MATH520 · MATH510 · MATH425 · MATH6754 · CCC410 · MATH410 · MATH401 · MATHALG · MATHH410 · 70 lifetime ratings

AI rating
100/100
RMP rating
4.7/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
1.9

The decision

if you struggle with math and want a .

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyPatient Math CoachBeginner FriendlyExtra CreditEasy TestsDeeply Caring
  • Students overwhelmingly describe him as patient, caring, and ideal for people who struggle with math.
  • , and effort is rewarded generously.
  • The main drawback is that he can be disorganized, ramble, or feel too unstructured for self-directed learners.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

88/100

An A is very reachable if , and use his support, but it is not completely effort-free.

, while the single online review supports his help but gives little grading detail.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

78/100

Math content can still require practice, but his slow pace, patience, and .

Both formats praise his support, but detailed course-easiness .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

as important for success, though strict penalties are not clearly proven.

In-person reviews repeatedly stress showing up, while the online review .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

98/100

Students recommend him because he is patient, caring, and .

Both formats are positive, but the recommendation confidence is driven by the large in-person review base.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Generous

92/100

Grading is generous because students mention , and passing students who show effort.

Format shift

In-person reviews provide most grading evidence, while the online review supports .

Workload

Light

76/100

The workload is manageable with , and studying, but students must keep up and attend.

Format shift

, and attendance expectations, while online workload evidence is sparse.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Students consistently describe him as , and committed to helping everyone understand math.

Format shift

Both online and evidence from in-person classes.

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

Assessment appears balanced , and class participation.

Format shift

In-person , and ; online assessment details are unclear.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

49 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

as caring, patient, generous, and especially helpful for anxious or struggling math students.

Main concern

Some students say he rambles, is disorganized, or requires students to use support resources.

What students said

“he will do everything to help”
MATH410
“The test and .”
MATH510
“At times I felt self taught.”
MATH520

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

The online review strongly praises his kindness, support, and suitability for students weak in math.

Main concern

Only one online review exists, so online-specific logistics are not well proven.

What students said

“If .”
510AND520
“he'll go the extra mile every time”
510AND520

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams appear student-friendly because students , and calculator use, but no online exam policy is proven.

Easy TestsTest ReviewsRetakes MentionedCalculators Allowed

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

84/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and calculator use, making exams student-friendly.

Easy TestsTest ReviewsRetakes MentionedCalculators Allowed
“The test and .”
MATH510
“ ”
MATH410
“Allows calculators.”
MATH410
“ .”
MATH410

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, webcam use, open-book status, or .

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“With compassion, creativity and patience he gets the hardest concepts across to his students.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

98/100

“ !”

📈 Easy A Potential

88/100

“If you do all your hpomework and show up to class you WILL get an A.”

⚖️

92/100

“gives alot of ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He makes math fun and easy to understand.
  • He has the patience to teach students at their own pace.
  • He is the type, that doesn't rush the material until everyone understands it.
  • , and .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • The test and .
  • If you do all your hpomework and show up to class you WILL get an A.
  • Study and you will pass
  • If you try your best, show him you care about passing, he will pass you.

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • he'll go the extra mile every time
  • He really does care about his students and wants everyone to pass.
  • he goes way out of his way to ensure his students are doing good.
  • He is always there for his students.

Theme 4

⚠️ About Structure

  • Me might be a
  • Good teacher, but tends to ramble on about stuff that is not important.
  • At times I felt self taught.
  • I need a more structured professor but overall he is still a great professor.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

70

Lifetime ratings

92/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 50 reviews across many years show a very consistent pattern of strong teaching and generous support.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 561
4 out of 56
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

MATH41017 reviews
MATH51012 reviews
MATH4016 reviews
MATH5206 reviews
4101 review
Show 8 more courses
510AND5201 review
823511 review
CCC4101 review
MATH4251 review
MATH67541 review
MATHALG1 review
MATHH4101 review
MATHLAB1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

10 reported outcomes

A range

4

A+ 1 · A 3

B range

3

B- 3

C range

2

C 2

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1