AI Rate Professor

History

Bryan Lawson

HIST17 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
43/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Take him only if and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProDifficult To FollowStudy GuidesCurved GradesExtra CreditAttendance Optional
  • The instructor seems new and nervous, and lectures are .
  • because they are not based on what students feel he teaches.
  • , and optional attendance soften the course.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

58/100

A good grade is possible with study guides, a curve, and , but .

All grade-effort .

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The course is not described as conceptually extreme, but and .

, and it points to standard content made harder by delivery.

Is attendance flexible?

Optional

88/100

The review says he takes roll but .

Attendance evidence comes only from the in-person HIST17 review.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

35/100

The because lectures are and tests feel disconnected from instruction.

Recommendation evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

70/100

A curve, , and study guides make .

Format shift

Only the .

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Workload is not described as heavy, but .

Format shift

The single in-person review does not report overwhelming work.

Teaching experience

Average

50/100

Teaching is mixed because the instructor is described as nervous and but provides supports.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

75/100

The review emphasizes tests and .

Format shift

Only the .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The in-person review describes confusing lectures but , and .

Main concern

, so .

What students said

“lectures are difficult to follow.”
HIST17
“ .”
HIST17

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, and , but do not clearly prove book policy or proctoring.

Tests MentionedStudy GuidesCurveExtra Credit

Assessment risk

Standard

52/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The in-person review says tests are difficult to align with lectures but .

Tests MentionedStudy GuidesCurveExtra Credit
“ .”
HIST17
“Gives study guides so you know what to specifically look up for tests.”
HIST17

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching, exams, and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

50/100

“Young, new, and nervous instructor - and it shows.”

📝

52/100

“ .”

⚖️

70/100

“Grades on a curve. offered.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Young, new, and nervous instructor - and it shows.
  • Videos are shown every single class to reinforce lectures while lectures are difficult to follow.

Theme 2

📝

  • .
  • Gives study guides so you know what to specifically look up for tests.
  • Grades on a curve. offered.

Theme 3

🚪

  • Takes roll but .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

35/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is limited because there is only one older review, though it includes , and grading.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

HIST171 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values