AI Rate Professor

Philosophy

Gary Aurouze

PHILOS70 · PHIL70INTRO · HUM20 · PHILO72 · PHL70 · PHLIO70 · PHILOSOPHY · HONORSPHILO72 · PHIL70 · PHIL72 · HSEMINETHICS · 32 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
3.7/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

if you want a fairly easy philosophy class and can tolerate a .

Best fit · Effort For RewardEasy gradingDiscussion heavyBoring lecturesCaring professorExtra credit
  • Most students describe the class as easy to pass or easy to earn a high grade in if they attend and participate.
  • Teaching reviews are mixed, with many praising his kindness and discussions while others call lectures boring or unclear.
  • Assessments often seem student-friendly, with comments mentioning no tests in some sections, , and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

86/100

Getting an A usually looks easy if students , and use or study aids.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The course content can be abstract or dull, but students repeatedly say he keeps requirements simple and manageable.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

48/100

as formally mandatory, but participation and showing up are often central to doing well.

and participation.

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

76/100

and , but several strong negative comments lower confidence in a universal recommendation.

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

84/100

Students mention easy assignments, , and , though a few warn that quizzes or limited tests can matter.

Format shift

.

Workload

Light

82/100

Many reviews describe little homework, easy assignments, discussion, papers, movies, or a .

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Good

74/100

Students often call him kind, caring, thoughtful, and discussion-oriented, but several describe him as .

Format shift

Teaching evidence is entirely in person.

Assessment method

Balanced

52/100

Assessments vary by section, with participation, essays, projects, quizzes, tests, and all appearing in comments.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

32 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews show an easy, participation-based philosophy experience with mixed reactions to his lecture style.

Main concern

Some students find him monotone, boring, or .

What students said

“super easy class. definitely an easy A.”
HONORSPHILO72
“ but .”
PHIL70
“ but the class was incredibly boring.”
PHIL72

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam risk appears low overall because several comments describe no tests, , though quizzes can be tricky.

No tests in some sectionsStudy guidesNotes allowed on testsExtra creditEssay final

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person comments support a student-friendly exam pattern with no tests in some sections, study guides, notes allowed, essays, and .

No tests in some sectionsStudy guidesNotes allowed on testsEssay finalExtra credit
“ .”
PHIL72
“ but .”
PHIL70
“Final, was 3 essays no more than 2 pages each.”
PHIL70

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Easy class to pass. Gives study guide & allows notes for tests & .”

Voice snapshots generated from 32 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and class format. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

74/100

“Wonderful teacher, really involves everyone in class.”

📈 Easy A Potential

86/100

“super easy class. definitely an easy A.”

⚖️

84/100

“ but .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Wonderful teacher, really involves everyone in class.
  • He is very hard to understand, sounds like he has marbles in his mouth.
  • he is so monotone.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • super easy class. definitely an easy A.
  • Easy class to pass.
  • As long as you do the work he assigns, you'll pass!

Theme 3

🧠 About Class Experience

  • Gets you thinking about life.
  • Class is very interesting.
  • This guy is very dry... his lectures get boring to listen to.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

32

Recent reviews read by the AI

32

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

The rating uses 32 detailed in-person reviews across many years, though older comments dominate and opinions vary.

Inside 32 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 515
4 out of 56
3 out of 55
2 out of 53
1 out of 53

Course coverage

PHIL7012 reviews
PHIL725 reviews
PHILOSOPHY5 reviews
HUM202 reviews
PHIL70INTRO2 reviews
Show 6 more courses
HONORSPHILO721 review
HSEMINETHICS1 review
PHILO721 review
PHILOS701 review
PHL701 review
PHLIO701 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not_Sure_Yet 1