AI Rate Professor

Graphic Arts

Laurie Makela

ART63 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
62/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
50%
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

if you can learn software independently and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProCaringGreat FeedbackHelpful CritiquesNeeds More Software InstructionBeginner Gap
  • Students describe her as nice, caring, funny, and strong at critiques and feedback.
  • The main weakness is limited instruction on programs and software for beginners.
  • The evidence is thin, with only two in-person reviews and mixed recommendation signals.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

76/100

The limited grade evidence includes an A and moderate difficulty, but the comments do not prove a free or effortless A.

All , so confidence is low.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

66/100

The class seems manageable, but students without software experience may find the course harder without more examples.

, and one specifically notes beginner software support gaps.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

No online evidence exists, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

55/100

and care, but the recommendation signal is mixed because .

Recommendation evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

The only reported grade is an A and difficulty is low to moderate, but .

Format shift

very small sample.

Workload

Light

72/100

Reviews do not mention heavy workload, and the difficulty ratings are low to moderate.

Format shift

Workload evidence .

Teaching experience

Good

70/100

She is described as nice, caring, and strong with critiques, but she may not provide enough software instruction for beginners.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

, and software rather than exams.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe course work.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and personality but suggest beginners may need more software demonstrations and examples.

Main concern

Students new to Photoshop or Illustrator .

What students said

“Very nice.”
ART63
“she should go over more of the programs & software.”
ART63

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly describe exams, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy or .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“she should go over more of the programs & software.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in feedback and software support. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

70/100

“She does give great critiques & feedback, which leads to her encouraging you to go further with your ideas.”

📘 Beginner Support

66/100

“Perhaps more examples to provide students who haven't used Photoshop/Illustrator before, too.”

👍 Recommendation Fit

55/100

“Utilize the time she spends with .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫

  • Good.
  • She does give great critiques & feedback, which leads to her encouraging you to go further with your ideas.

Theme 2

💻 About Software Support

  • she should go over more of the programs & software.
  • Perhaps more examples to provide students who haven't used Photoshop/Illustrator before, too.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

, so conclusions are useful but fragile.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ART632 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values