AI Rate Professor

Biology

Fatemeh Almasarweh

BIO20 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
32/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

Consider other options unless you can handle strict policies and rely on study guides and to manage the class.

Best fit · Self Taught ProNot RecommendedStrict PoliciesVisual LearningExtra CreditTest Heavy
  • Both reviewers would not take her again, making recommendation confidence low despite one useful teaching comment.
  • One review praises visuals, study guides, and opportunities.
  • The , and lack of responsiveness to feedback.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

and study guides help, but strict missed-exam rules and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Standard

50/100

The content sounds manageable with visuals and study guides, but catching up after cancellations and .

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

15/100

, and the tag says skipping class can prevent passing.

All attendance and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

20/100

because of poor responsiveness, strictness, and policy concerns.

but both students still do not recommend her.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

helps, but strict missed-exam rules and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The workload is not described as excessive, but , and catch-up after canceled classes require steady effort.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

One student liked her visuals and study guides, but another strongly criticized her listening and .

Format shift

In-person teaching evidence is limited and mixed, with .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

80/100

The comments and tags emphasize exams, study guides, the , and .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

, though one student found the visuals, study guides, and helpful.

Main concern

Strict policies and weak responsiveness to students are the main concerns.

What students said

“Doesn't listen to her students and .”
BIO20
“She gives a study guide for and gives many opportunities.”
BIO20

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are supported by study guides and , but the and no book or proctoring policy is proven.

Study GuidesFinal ExamStrict Missed-Exam PolicyTest Heavy

Assessment risk

Strict

35/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and strict missed-exam rules, but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, or proctoring rules.

Study GuidesFinal ExamStrict Missed-Exam Policy
“She gives a study guide for and gives many opportunities.”
BIO20
“ unless hospitalized.”
BIO20

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I took her and regretted it.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, recommendation, and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“This professor uses a lot of drawing and visuals for learning .”

👍 Recommendation Rate

20/100

“I took her and regretted it.”

🧪

35/100

“She gives a study guide for and gives many opportunities.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Doesn't listen to her students and .
  • This professor uses a lot of drawing and visuals for learning .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She gives a study guide for and gives many opportunities.
  • She is very strict and unless hospitalized.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

Only two older reviews are available, and they give mixed detail despite .

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

BIO202 reviews

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1