AI Rate Professor

Art History

Orville Clarke Jr.

ARTHIHIST · HISTOFPHOT · ART3ONLINE · ARTHISTORY3 · ART3 · ARTHISTORY5 · ART5 · ARTHISTORY · ARTPHOTOHIST · ART95 · PHOTOHIST · PHOTO1 · ARTHST · ART1 · ARTHISTONLINE · 76 lifetime ratings

AI rating
53/100
RMP rating
3.4/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you enjoy story-heavy art lectures and can manage loosely structured writing without much hand-holding.

Best fit · Self Taught ProEntertaining LecturesHeavy WritingDisorganizedLenient DeadlinesPolarizing
  • Students are sharply split between loving his lively lectures and .
  • The in-person class can feel easy if students keep up, but writing can pile up heavily.
  • Comments about online experiences are negative, but the authoritative input counts all reviews as in person.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

62/100

Some students call it an easy A or B, but many say the writing load and .

, though some in-person-labeled comments discuss online experiences.

Is the course easy?

Standard

55/100

The and stories, but memorization, papers, and unclear expectations add challenge.

All counted evidence is in person, with no online section to compare.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

because lectures and , though at least one student says missing class was still manageable.

as in person; there are no online reviews by authoritative count.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

52/100

and independence, but others strongly warn against his disorganization and workload.

All recommendation evidence is counted as in person; no online review count exists for a separate comparison.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

58/100

Deadlines can be flexible and tests may be guided, but .

Format shift

as in person; no online reviews are available by authoritative count.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Many students report a lot of writing, essays, museum reports, and end-of-semester assignment pileups.

Format shift

All workload evidence is counted as in person, though several comments .

Teaching experience

Average

57/100

He can be funny, knowledgeable, and memorable, but frequent complaints cite rambling, poor organization, and limited guidance.

Format shift

All teaching evidence is counted as in person; there are no online reviews by authoritative count.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

35/100

Reviews emphasize papers, essays, museum reports, drawing notes, and some midterms or finals.

Format shift

All assessment evidence is counted as in person; there are no online reviews by authoritative count.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person evidence is highly mixed, with many students praising entertaining lectures and lenient deadlines while others , and poor organization.

Main concern

Writing workload and .

What students said

“The man is hilarious! .”
ART5
“If you feel like writing an average of 30 essays during the semester, you will enjoy this class!”
ARTHISTORY3
“His classes are for people who are self starters.”
PHOTO1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exam evidence varies by course, but several students describe midterms or .

Study Guide Questions And AnswersMidterms And FinalPhoto MemorizationNo Final In One Course

Assessment risk

Standard

62/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and study guides, but do not clearly prove strict proctoring or open-book policies.

Study Guide Questions And AnswersMidterms And FinalPhoto MemorizationNo Final In One Course
“2 midterms and AND answers as a 'study guide'), 1 paper and 1 museum visit.”
ART3
“had to memorize photos and take 1 tests and final.”
PHOTO1
“ ...woot!!”
ART1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“His classes are for people who are self starters.”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

57/100

“Fun lectures, poor teaching skills.”

📚 Workload Reality

32/100

“way too much writing, more than all my other classes combined.”

👍 Recommendation Split

52/100

“With this class, you either love it, or you hate it.”

⚖️

58/100

“Will cut you a break with assignments and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The man is hilarious!
  • He always went into depth with each painting and told gave us all really juicy facts behind artists and their paintings.
  • Fun lectures, poor teaching skills.
  • He continuously rambles about his family and it eventually becomes tacky.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • easy A or B
  • Study like MAD!
  • He tells you what the questions are going to be on the mid-term and final.
  • I went to class everyday and , but still had no idea what he wanted on the final.

Theme 3

📝 About Workload And Organization

  • A LOT of writing.
  • so much writing I thought I was drowning in essays!
  • Everything at once, with absolutely no help along the way.
  • This class was so !

Theme 4

❤️ About Fit

  • His classes are for people who are self starters.
  • .
  • ! Run for the hills!
  • !

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

76

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty reviews over many years provide rich, consistent themes despite highly mixed opinions and some vague entries.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 531
4 out of 512
3 out of 511
2 out of 56
1 out of 516

Course coverage

ART513 reviews
ART39 reviews
ART16 reviews
ARTHISTORY6 reviews
PHOTO15 reviews
Show 10 more courses
ARTHISTORY32 reviews
ART3ONLINE1 review
ART951 review
ARTHIHIST1 review
ARTHISTONLINE1 review
ARTHISTORY51 review
ARTHST1 review
ARTPHOTOHIST1 review
HISTOFPHOT1 review
PHOTOHIST1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values