AI Rate Professor

Child Development

Staci Iizumi

CDE6 · CDE1 · CDE4 · CDE3 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
41/100
RMP rating
2.7/5
Take again
66.67%
Difficulty
3.2

The decision

Take her only if you can , and a .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHard graderUnclear lecturesTest heavyNo extra creditGroup projects
  • Student experiences are sharply mixed, with some praise for organization but .
  • Multiple reviews describe hard grading, , and stressful expectations.
  • All evidence is in person, with no online review data.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

An A appears hard because students report , and points lost for small issues.

All evidence is from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The content feels harder because , and students say the class is harder than it should be.

Only in-person reviews describe course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

One student says lack of participation can be marked as an and engagement feel strict.

The .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

Recommendation depends on learning style because some students praise her organization while , and stress.

All recommendation evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online comparison.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

22/100

Students repeatedly mention hard grading, no , no chances, and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students mention many , and high stress.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Teaching is inconsistent, with some praise for organization but and fast lectures.

Format shift

, and they are mixed but mostly critical.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

82/100

Reviews repeatedly mention tests and quizzes, with some assignments and group projects also present.

Format shift

In-person comments provide all assessment evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are mixed but lean negative, with praise for , and stressful tests.

Main concern

The biggest concern is strict grading combined with and difficult tests.

What students said

“Did not like this class. Teacher is very hard and .”
CDE3
“ and delivers high quality teaching with reasonable flexibility.”
CDE4
“She is most definitely a .”
CDE4

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The and quizzes with no clear student-friendly policy.

Long TestsHard TestsQuiz HeavyNo Make-Up Quizzes

Assessment risk

Strict

28/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews describe easy tests in one course but more often report , and .

Long TestsHard TestsQuiz HeavyNo Make-Up Quizzes
“The and hard.”
CDE3
“ ”
CDE3
“ ”
CDE6

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Did not like this class. Teacher is very hard and . Made the class a lot harder then it should have been.”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“Teacher is very hard and .”

⚖️

22/100

“She is most definitely a .”

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“This is not an easy class, she expects you to have all assignments done and ready to turn in, ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • and delivers high quality teaching with reasonable flexibility.
  • Her lectures aren't the
  • most lectures are so long you end up not realizing what she just spoke about.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • She is most definitely a .
  • .
  • The and hard.

Theme 3

🧩 About Class Structure

  • we had a lot of
  • Get ready to read

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Nine reviews across multiple courses give enough detail and show a consistent pattern of and mixed teaching quality.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 54
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CDE35 reviews
CDE42 reviews
CDE11 review
CDE61 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

1

D 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

3

Drop/Withdrawal 1 · Not sure yet 1 · Rather not say 1