AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Sandra Clay

PEDSPEDS · NUR34 · ADN20 · NSG21 · ADN34L · ADN3 · ADN · ADN23 · ADN34 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
15/100
RMP rating
2.6/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.4

The decision

Avoid Sandra Clay unless you are prepared for a strict, high-pressure nursing environment with serious clinical consequences.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerIntimidating ClinicalsHarsh Grading RiskHigh DifficultyMixed Teaching ReviewsWrite-Up Concerns
  • Reviews are polarized, but the strongest and most recent comments describe intimidation, write-ups, and fear of failing clinical.
  • Several students say she knows the material or can be helpful, yet negative experiences are severe.
  • The course appears difficult to pass, with high pressure and limited tolerance for mistakes.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Getting an A appears very difficult because reviews emphasize strict clinical standards, write-ups, and hard-to-pass exams.

All .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

18/100

The nursing content and clinical expectations are described as demanding, stressful, and difficult to pass.

All course-difficulty evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

50/100

Reviews do not clearly prove a , but the clinical setting implies high participation expectations.

Only in-person reviews exist, and they .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most strong comments warn against her because of intimidation, harsh handling of mistakes, and poor support.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

10/100

Students report failing clinical, exaggerated write-ups, and exams with material not covered in class.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Reviews focus less on volume of assignments and more on heavy clinical pressure, preparation demands, and pass risk.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

32/100

A few students call her helpful and knowledgeable, but many describe intimidation, poor support, and hostile clinical teaching.

Format shift

Teaching-quality evidence is entirely in person.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

75/100

, and few graded items more than regular assignments.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

with some praise for knowledge but many severe complaints about intimidation and pass risk.

Main concern

Students report intimidation, harsh consequences for mistakes, and difficulty passing clinical or exams.

What students said

“Intimidating in lecture/clinical pretty much sums up Mrs clay.”
NUR34
“Horrible instructor. More like a micro manager who writes students up instead of helping them learn.”
NSG21
“extremely difficult to pass class”
ADN3

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews describe difficult exams and few grading opportunities, but do .

Difficult ExamsQuestions Not CoveredFew Graded ItemsPolicy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

covered and grades may rely on few things, but specific exam rules are not clearly proven.

Difficult ExamsQuestions Not CoveredFew Graded Items
“ in sylbus”
ADN3
“GRADED BY FEW THINGS”
NUR34

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Horrible instructor. More like a micro manager who writes students up instead of helping them learn.”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation strength. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

32/100

“Only helpful if she likes you.”

⚖️

10/100

“She writes you up with blown out of proportion, exaggerations and made up situations to justify her actions which will end up with you failing clinical.”

👍 Recommendation Level

18/100

“Go to any other RN program!!!!!! !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Intimidating in lecture/clinical pretty much sums up Mrs clay.
  • Horrible instructor. More like a micro manager who writes students up instead of helping them learn.
  • Great teacher! Knows her stuff.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty And Grades

  • extremely difficult to pass class
  • in sylbus
  • Don't step out of line, and don't get on her bad side

Theme 3

❤️ About Support And Character

  • Great instructor. Encourages students to succeed
  • Very helpful!! Awesome teacher!!
  • The . Very helpful and not intimidating at all.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

68/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven reviews span many years and include consistent severe complaints, but the sample is older and somewhat polarized.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 52
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ADN202 reviews
NUR342 reviews
ADN1 review
ADN231 review
ADN31 review
Show 4 more courses
ADN341 review
ADN34L1 review
NSG211 review
PEDSPEDS1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values