AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Karen Tannenbaum

SCSCI1791690 · SCSCI17 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
93/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.0

The decision

She looks like a strong choice for students who want an open-minded and motivating in-person class.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyMotivatingOpen MindedRespectedCritical ThinkingDiscussion Based
  • Both reviews describe her as highly motivating and enjoyable.
  • Students should be present, proactive, and ready to read course material.
  • The limited evidence is very positive but based on only two reviews.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

64/100

Grades seem fair if students attend, participate, and read, but the comments do not prove an automatic easy A.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Standard

56/100

The subject may require openness and critical thinking, but students describe the teaching as clear and motivating.

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

as mandatory, but one review directly tells students to be present and proactive.

Only in-person reviews mention presence in class.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

Both students strongly praise her motivation, respectfulness, and classroom presence.

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

70/100

One review says weak grades are the student's fault, suggesting fair .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

58/100

Students mention reading and active participation, but .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Excellent

96/100

Both reviews praise her motivation, respectfulness, openness, and ability to teach a sensitive subject well.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Reviews emphasize reading, presence, and proactive class work, with .

Format shift

, and they do not describe exams.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

and describe her as motivating, respectful, and good at handling sensitive material.

Main concern

The main caution is that the evidence base is small and students still need to participate and read.

What students said

“I loved her as an instructor.”
SCSCI17
“Very interesting and motivating teacher.”
SCSCI1791690

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The reviews do not clearly prove exam .

No Clear Exam Evidence

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format, midterms, finals, or proctoring.

No Clear Exam Evidence

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“A real 10/10 teacher.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, engagement, and grading; credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

96/100

“I loved her as an instructor.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

92/100

“A real 10/10 teacher.”

📚 Engagement Needed

58/100

“Be present and proactive in class, be ready and read the course material.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She was so wonderfully motivated and a real joy to be around.
  • Very interesting and motivating teacher.
  • Open minded , use of critical thinking.

Theme 2

📈 About Effort & Grades

  • Any less than satisfactory grade was the fault of the student,and nobody to my knowledge received one anyways.
  • Be present and proactive in class, be ready and read the course material.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

The evidence is detailed and consistent but limited to only two in-person reviews from a short time span.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

SCSCI171 review
SCSCI17916901 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Rather not say 1