AI Rate Professor

Education

Mark Quick

GUID2 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
96/100
RMP rating
5.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

if you want an and positive classroom energy.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyInteresting lecturesEngaging discussionsGood humorPositive classroom energy
  • Students describe the class as interesting and discussion-based.
  • Both reviews report strong quality ratings and A-range grades.
  • Evidence is positive but thin because .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

Both reported grades are in the A range, but the comments do not prove that the A required minimal effort.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

72/100

The course sounds accessible because students mention good lectures and .

Only in-person comments describe the course experience.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The reviews .

, and there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

Students rated him highly and described the class as interesting and enjoyable.

The recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

76/100

A and A- outcomes suggest grading may be favorable, but comments .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

Reviews mention discussions and activities but .

Format shift

In-person comments give limited workload evidence, with no online comparison.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Students praise the lectures, discussions, activities, and humor.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews mention class discussions and activities but as dominant.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention class activities.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

and highlight good lectures, activities, and humor.

Main concern

The evidence is limited to two short reviews from the same date.

What students said

“good lectures, interesting class discussions and activities”
GUID2
“Great sense of humor”
GUID2

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“good lectures, interesting class discussions and activities”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and classroom tone. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“good lectures, interesting class discussions and activities”

👍 Student Enjoyment

92/100

“Great sense of humor”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • good lectures, interesting class discussions and activities
  • Great sense of humor

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

Only two short reviews from 2016 are available, so the but lightly supported.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

GUID22 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

2 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values