AI Rate Professor

Aeronautics

Thomas Teeguarden

AERO34B · AERO14D · AERO34D · AEROAERO · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
39/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

if you can handle a demanding, polarizing instructor and are comfortable learning through references and instructions.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerKnowledgeable but polarizingHigh difficultyStrong negative reportsInstruction-focused expectations
  • Student opinion is sharply split between knowledgeable and very poor teacher descriptions.
  • Several negative reviews strongly criticize his teaching and attitude.
  • Positive reviews say he helps students, knows the field, and expects students to follow instructions.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

34/100

High difficulty ratings and comments about referencing answers and using textbooks suggest an A would require serious effort.

All evidence is from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

The course appears demanding because students describe high difficulty, textbook dependence, and having to think through the work.

Only in-person reviews describe course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The reviews .

, and there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Recommendation is risky because positive comments about knowledge and help are offset by multiple severe warnings.

The recommendation evidence is entirely in person and highly polarized.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

35/100

Comments suggest strict expectations through references, textbooks, and following instructions, with .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss expectations.

Workload

Heavy

32/100

Students describe having to reference answers, use textbooks, and think carefully through the work.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Poor

45/100

Some students call him knowledgeable and helpful, but several intense reviews describe him as a bad or worst teacher.

Format shift

Teaching evidence is in-person only and strongly conflicted.

Assessment method

Balanced

45/100

Reviews mention references, textbooks, and instructions but do .

Format shift

Only in-person comments give limited assessment evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are highly mixed, with some students calling him knowledgeable and helpful while others strongly warn against taking him.

Main concern

The main concern is inconsistent teaching perception and several intense negative reports.

What students said

“Very knowledgeable. Ignore irrelevant negativity here”
AERO34B
“The believe they havent fired him yet.”
AERO34B
“Teacher is willing to help everyone and is very knowledgeable but makes you think about what you are doing.”
AERO14D

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Teacher is willing to help everyone and is very knowledgeable but makes you think about what you are doing.”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, difficulty, and polarization. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“Tom is overall a bad teacher.”

📚 Difficulty Level

34/100

“very helpfull but makes you reference all answers and makes you use your textbooks easy going attitude towards the student.”

⚖️ Mixed Reputation

42/100

“Very knowledgeable. Ignore irrelevant negativity here”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very knowledgeable. Ignore irrelevant negativity here
  • Tom is overall a bad teacher.
  • Teacher is willing to help everyone and is very knowledgeable but makes you think about what you are doing.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Expectations

  • very helpfull but makes you reference all answers and makes you use your textbooks easy going attitude towards the student.
  • The believe they havent fired him yet.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

60/100

Evidence confidence

Seven reviews span several years and show a consistent split, but many are old and some are vague or emotionally extreme.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

AERO34B3 reviews
AERO14D2 reviews
AERO34D1 review
AEROAERO1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values