AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Edward Collins

ACTG1B · ACCTG1B · ACCTG1A · ACCT1A · 6 lifetime ratings

AI rating
41/100
RMP rating
3.0/5
Take again
100%
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

Take him only if , and seek help early.

Best fit · Self Taught ProAccounting ExpertiseHeavy HomeworkMixed Teaching QualityAttendance ImportantSelf-Driven Success
  • Reviews are sharply mixed, with one strong online review and several critical in-person reviews.
  • Accounting is described as , and dependent on steady effort.
  • Some students found him helpful, while others said he gave little instruction or made questions feel unwelcome.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

42/100

Good grades are possible, but students repeatedly say , and often tutoring.

Online evidence frames homework as the path to tests, while , and self-study.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Accounting is described as difficult, especially journal entries, trial balances, and bank reconciliations.

Both online and in-person reviews describe the course content as challenging.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

Students directly say attendance and , and one tag says skipping class means you will not pass.

The and in-person comments.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

48/100

Recommendation depends on whether you can learn independently and keep up with heavy accounting practice.

The online review is strongly positive, while and include severe warnings.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

Grades can be good with effort, but the path is demanding and not described as lenient.

Format shift

Online and work.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students repeatedly mention lots of , and tutoring needs.

Format shift

Both formats show heavy effort, with the online review explicitly saying there is a lot of homework.

Teaching experience

Average

46/100

His expertise and availability help some students, but others report poor instruction and discouraging responses to questions.

Format shift

Online teaching is praised, while .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

, and tests, so assessment appears mixed rather than exam-only.

Format shift

Online evidence links homework to tests, while and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mixed, with some students finding him helpful and others saying instruction is poor.

Main concern

Several students , and asking for help rather than clear lectures.

What students said

“Horrible! Will make you feel stupid if you ask questions and .”
ACTG1B
“Attendance and .”
ACCTG1A
“No meaningful instruction; you're on your own.”
ACCT1A

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The online review is very positive, saying his experience helps and .

Main concern

The workload is high and accounting can be challenging.

What students said

“There is a lot of homework and can be challenging at times with all the journal entries”
ACCTG1A
“if you can do the .”
ACCTG1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests and handwritten accounting problems, but do not .

Homework Prepares For TestsWritten Accounting Problems

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but do not clearly prove book policy or proctoring.

Written Accounting Problems
“I learned a lot from his tests in which you had to handwrite trial balances, bank reconciliations, etc.”
ACCTG1A

Online

The online review says homework prepares students for tests, but it does .

Homework Prepares For Tests
“if you can do the .”
ACCTG1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“No meaningful instruction; you're on your own.”

Voice snapshots generated from 6 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

46/100

“He is very experienced in accounting.”

📚 Workload Reality

25/100

“There is a lot of homework and can be challenging at times with all the journal entries”

⚖️ Grade Effort

42/100

“Go to class and and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He is very experienced in accounting.
  • Horrible! Will make you feel stupid if you ask questions and .
  • No meaningful instruction; you're on your own.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • There is a lot of homework and can be challenging at times with all the journal entries
  • Go to class and and .
  • Attendance and .

Theme 3

🧭 About Getting Help

  • and after class.
  • If you're struggling, speak up and go to tutoring.
  • Tutoring is the ONLY way you will pass this guy's class.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

6

Recent reviews read by the AI

6

Lifetime ratings

72/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because six detailed reviews show consistent workload concerns but mixed teaching experiences across formats.

Inside 6 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 52
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ACCTG1A3 reviews
ACCT1A1 review
ACCTG1B1 review
ACTG1B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

4 reported outcomes

A range

2

A+ 1 · A- 1

B range

1

B- 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1