AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Jamal Shweikeh

CHEM88393 · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
9/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

Avoid unless you are prepared to teach yourself and accept major uncertainty from limited evidence.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor preparationLow recommendationTest concernsAcademic integrity issue
  • The only review is extremely negative and says the class did not prepare students for tests.
  • The student reports a serious academic integrity concern involving answers being given for a department test.
  • Evidence is very limited because there is only one review.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

The student earned a B but described poor preparation, so grades appear possible only with high self-reliance and weak instructional support.

Evidence .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The course experience appears difficult because the student says tests were not properly prepared for or supported.

Evidence .

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review gives .

Evidence comes only from one in-person review, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

The only student strongly criticizes the teaching and .

Evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

There is , though the reported B suggests passing was possible.

Format shift

Only one in-person review exists and .

Workload

Moderate

45/100

The review focuses on tests and poor preparation, not on workload volume.

Format shift

Only one in-person review exists and .

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

The only review says he failed to prepare students for tests and created a very negative learning experience.

Format shift

Evidence comes only from one in-person review, with no online teaching evidence.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

90/100

The review centers on tests and a department test, making exams the only clearly supported assessment evidence.

Format shift

Only the .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

The single in-person review , and a serious integrity concern.

Main concern

The student says he did not prepare the class for tests.

What students said

“Worst teacher in 2 years at Chaffey.”
CHEM88393
“He didn't prepare us for ”
CHEM88393

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The and poor preparation, but does not prove specific exam rules such as closed-book or proctoring.

Department TestExam preparation concernExam policy not clearly proven

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The and a department test, but does not clearly prove exam rules, proctoring, or open-book status.

Department TestExam preparation concern
“He didn't prepare us for tests”
CHEM88393
“ ”
CHEM88393

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Worst teacher in 2 years at Chaffey.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting the and testing. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

12/100

“He didn't prepare us for ”

👍 Recommendation Rate

5/100

“Worst teacher in 2 years at Chaffey.”

⚠️

25/100

“we had to take a ”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Quality

  • Worst teacher in 2 years at Chaffey.
  • He didn't prepare us for

Theme 2

🧪 About Tests

  • we had to take a
  • He didn't prepare us for tests

Theme 3

⚠️ About Integrity Concern

  • he helped us cheat by giving us 15 of the answers
  • he wouldn't have had to violate his integrity and tell us to cheat

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because the analysis relies on one detailed but uncorroborated review.

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 51

Course coverage

CHEM883931 review

Reported outcomes

B range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

1

B 1

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values