AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Ginka Gavrilov

MATH410 · MATH25 · MATH520 · 11 lifetime ratings

AI rating
35/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.6

The decision

if you are already strong in math and and strict attendance.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHeavy online homeworkMandatory attendanceFast lecturesCaring motivatorCostly access code
  • some praise her kindness and motivation, while .
  • , and required access codes create a heavy workload.
  • Attendance rules and weaker math students.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

Some students earned A-range grades, but comments , and preparation require major effort.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with no online-class reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

32/100

Students , and a need to already be good at math.

Only in-person reviews exist, and they consistently show a challenging course experience.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

5/100

One review says attendance is mandatory with no excused absences and .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Recommendation depends on math strength because and several strong warnings not to take her.

All , and it is sharply mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Grades include A-range outcomes, but students report , and little margin for small mistakes.

Format shift

.

Workload

Overwhelming

12/100

Many students report hours of , and required web platforms.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and workload complaints are frequent.

Teaching experience

Average

52/100

She is often described as nice and motivating, but .

Format shift

All teaching evidence is in person and mixed.

Assessment method

Balanced

55/100

, and a final, so assessment appears split between assignments and exams.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

11 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews show a demanding math class with caring support but major , and online homework tools.

Main concern

The main and strict attendance.

What students said

“ !”
MATH25
“ABE READY .”
25
“ because there is no time”
MATH25

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews mention tests, quizzes, and a , but they do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book status, or closed-book rules.

TestsHard FinalNo Study GuideOnline Quizzes

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a but do not clearly prove proctoring or book policy.

TestsHard FinalNo Study GuideOnline Quizzes
“ ”
MATH25
“We just had our first test, she did not give out a study guide.”
MATH25
“ and quizzes are good but and effort”
MATH25

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Unless you are good .”

Voice snapshots generated from 11 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and attendance; credibility rating: High.

📚 Workload Pressure

12/100

“ABE READY .”

🎯 Teaching Quality

52/100

“ , and understanding .”

⚖️

30/100

“Expect to make a 1 little mistake on a quiz and get marked down.”

Theme 1

📚 About Workload

  • and having it due online
  • It takes me on average 3.5 hours .
  • there was a lot of homework but it helped when .

Theme 2

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • because there is no time
  • Very nice teacher.
  • She is really good at explaining took her for math 410 and taking her for 425 and 25.

Theme 3

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Unless you are good .
  • and quizzes are good but and effort

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

11

Recent reviews read by the AI

11

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Eleven reviews over several years give detailed and , and assessment.

Inside 11 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 52
3 out of 53
2 out of 52
1 out of 52

Course coverage

MATH256 reviews
MATH4103 reviews
251 review
MATH5201 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

1

F 1

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values