AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Patricia Richardson

ACCTG1A · ACCT1A · ACC1A · ACCTG480 · ACCOUNTING1A · ACCTG460 · ACCTG6479 · BUS130 · ACC459 · ACCT101 · ACCOU5314 · 22 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.9

The decision

Take Patricia Richardson only if you can teach yourself accounting and keep up with a heavy weekly workload.

Best fit · Self Taught ProFast lecturesSelf-teaching requiredHeavy workloadHelpful when askedExtra credit available
  • Many students say lectures are rushed and unclear, so self-teaching is often necessary.
  • The , and study time, especially in person.
  • Some students value her help and , but recommendations are sharply mixed.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

32/100

An A is possible with , and , but many comments say it takes major effort and time.

The single online review mentions redos and help, while and heavy weekly work.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Accounting content is made , and frequent quizzes or homework.

Both formats report confusion, but the and more consistently negative.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

18/100

as important or necessary to pass and .

Attendance evidence comes mainly from in-person reviews, with .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

36/100

Students are split, but the strongest pattern warns against her because and the workload is stressful.

The online review is mixed but manageable, while in-person reviews include many .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

48/100

, redos, and advance exam problems help, but several and tough grading.

Format shift

Online evidence supports some point recovery, while and strict outcomes.

Workload

Heavy

24/100

Many comments , and major time commitment.

Format shift

The online review says the beginning was too much, while .

Teaching experience

Poor

35/100

Students often call her sweet and helpful, but , and leaves them self-teaching.

Format shift

The online review is confused but somewhat recoverable, while and pace.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Grades , and rather than one single assessment type.

Format shift

, and tests often, while the online review mentions tests and redos.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

21 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews consistently describe fast lectures, unclear , and .

Main concern

The main concern is that students often feel they must teach themselves.

What students said

“The lectures go by really fast, she assumes everyone get it the first time around.”
ACC1A
“You basically teach yourself”
ACCTG1A
“HW IS DUE EVERY WK”
ACCT1A

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

The online review says the class starts overwhelming but becomes manageable with routine, help, redos, and test review.

Main concern

The and too much material early on.

What students said

“In the beginning, I was failing because it was just TOO much.”
ACCT1A
“she does help you & allows you to redo things for .”
ACCT1A

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

and weekly quizzes, but and advance review problems reduce the exam risk somewhat.

Hard TestsWeekly QuizzesExtra Credit On ExamsAdvance Problem Review

Assessment risk

Standard

45/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and exam , but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, proctoring, or final format.

Hard TestsWeekly QuizzesExam Extra Credit
“ .”
ACCT1A
“ .”
ACCTG6479
“Each exam has about 15 points of ”
ACCTG1A

Online

The online review says she reads the tests for review, but it does not .

Test Review
“She literally reads the .”
ACCT1A

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“You basically teach yourself”

Voice snapshots generated from 22 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and support; credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

35/100

“ and barely covers the topics or equations.”

📚 Workload Pressure

24/100

“HW IS DUE EVERY WK, HW PROB VARY FROM 7-10 PER ASSIGNMENT,HW TKES ABOUT 4-7HRS TO COMPLETE”

⚖️ Grade Effort

32/100

“Do all the hmwk & ext credit, study, and pay attention. You will do well.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • The lectures go by really fast, she assumes everyone get it the first time around.
  • and barely covers the topics or equations.
  • You basically teach yourself

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Hard class, fair student evaluation, , worked hard
  • .
  • IF YOU WANT AN A!!

Theme 3

❤️ About Helpfulness

  • She is helpful is you ask for help & provides for you to succeed.
  • Instructor helped me a lot.
  • She will help her students.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

22

Recent reviews read by the AI

22

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is high because 22 reviews span several years and show consistent themes, despite mixed opinions.

Inside 22 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 58
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 56
1 out of 53

Course coverage

ACCT1A8 reviews
ACCTG1A4 reviews
ACC1A2 reviews
ACC4591 review
ACCOU53141 review
Show 6 more courses
ACCOUNTING1A1 review
ACCT1011 review
ACCTG4601 review
ACCTG4801 review
ACCTG64791 review
BUS1301 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

5 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 1 · A- 1

B range

1

B+ 1

C range

1

C+ 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Not sure yet 1