AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Howard Stewart

EGTECH14 · MATH410 · MATH520 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
10/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

unless you are comfortable teaching yourself and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing LecturerSelf-Teaching RequiredDismissive HelpPicky HomeworkAvoid If Possible
  • Most students describe his teaching as .
  • Several reviews say students must rely on the textbook and teach themselves.
  • Students report dismissive responses to questions and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

Getting a good grade appears difficult because students report , and weak help.

and technology reviews; there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Even entry-level material feels hard because and students must rely on the textbook.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

No format-specific attendance .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

15/100

Students repeatedly warn against taking him because and unhelpful.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Students describe him as and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

35/100

The workload feels heavy because students report having to teach themselves and .

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

Most reviews say he is confusing, unprepared, dismissive, or .

Format shift

Teaching evidence is entirely in person.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Homework is the clearest assessment theme, while .

Format shift

and format expectations.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are strongly negative, with repeated complaints about confusion, self-teaching, and poor help.

Main concern

Students say and can be dismissive when asked for help.

What students said

“ if you have to wait a ”
EGTECH14
“u basically have to teach ur selfe”
MATH410
“When you ask for help he sort of just laughs at you like you are stupid”
MATH520

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book policy, or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Standard

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly describe exams, quizzes, midterms, finals, or proctoring.

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you have to wait a ”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, self-teaching burden, and . Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

20/100

“Horrible Teacher. He has no idea what he is doing, and talks only to himself.”

👍 Recommendation Level

15/100

“Horrible. DO NOT GET HIS CLASS.”

⚖️

25/100

“very picky about how stuff is done and turned in.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • he doesnt know what hes doing.
  • Doesn't know what he is doing, cant do 1 math problem without a mistake
  • Hes an ok teacher but very slow and anoying.

Theme 2

📚 About Self-Teaching

  • u basically have to teach ur selfe
  • ur bestfriend in this class it will be your text book
  • cant actually help you.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Help And Grading

  • he often scoffs at questions, like he thinks the questions are stupid.
  • When you ask for help he sort of just laughs at you like you are stupid
  • Also he is much to picky .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

76/100

Evidence confidence

Eight reviews over several years show a consistent negative pattern, though many are old and grade data is sparse.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 53
1 out of 54

Course coverage

MATH5206 reviews
EGTECH141 review
MATH4101 review

Reported outcomes

C range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

1

C- 1

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values