AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Karen Pender

MATH9785 · MATH425 · MATH421 · MATH65A · MATH61A · MATH25 · PRECAL · MATH420 · MATH65B · MAT61 · CALC2 · CALCULUS65B · MATH1928 · MATH410 · MATH61 · MATH75 · 85 lifetime ratings

AI rating
34/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

unless you are strong in math, , and comfortable with strict grading and hard timed exams.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerVery hard testsHeavy homeworkStrict gradingFast pacePolarizing teacher
  • Students , and strict grading rules.
  • Teaching reviews are highly polarized, with some praising her precision and .
  • She may work for strong, disciplined math students, but many .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

An A requires major effort because students report , and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

24/100

The math content is challenging because reviews , and .

Only in-person reviews describe the course, and most frame it as difficult.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

35/100

Attendance appears very important for success, but reviews do not clearly prove a .

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

Most negative reviews warn students away because of , and hard timed exams.

Only in-person reviews exist, and the recommendation pattern is polarized but mostly cautionary.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

24/100

Students and problem work very strictly and expects her exact method.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

20/100

as lots, tons, daily, or taking hours, making the workload heavy.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention workload.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Some students praise her precision and help, but , and frustrates learners.

Format shift

All teaching evidence comes from in-person reviews, with strongly mixed but often negative comments.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Grades and a final, so assessment is mixed but test pressure is high.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

50 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews show a consistently demanding math class with , and sharply divided views on teaching quality.

Main concern

Many students say the , and students.

What students said

“She gives you only !”
MATH61
“ as if it were an .”
MATH61
“ , but really not necessary for an engineering person.”
MATH65A
“ and timed, no study guides!”
MATH425

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are repeatedly described as hard and timed, with at least one review saying equation sheets are not allowed.

Timed ExamsHard TestsNo Equation SheetsCumulative FinalReviews do not clearly prove book rules

Assessment risk

Strict

22/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

final, and no equation sheets in one calculus course, but do not clearly prove open-book or proctoring policy.

Timed ExamsHard TestsNo Equation SheetsCumulative Final
“She gives you only !”
MATH61
“ and timed, no study guides!”
MATH425
“No equation sheets allowed for tests.”
MATH65B
“ grade on a previous section.”
MATH25

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you are interested in actually learning the material, Pender is the way to go. If you don't care, and just want to get math out of the way so .”

Voice snapshots generated from 50 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“Although she knows her material well, she is not a very good teacher when it comes to explaining concepts.”

📚 Workload Pressure

20/100

“She ; there are 5 tests total.”

🧪

22/100

“ and timed, no study guides!”

⚖️

24/100

“Expect .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Nice person but not a great teacher.
  • She knows her stuff, but how she conveys what she is teaching to the students often is dry and you have to be a math nerd to understand her humor.
  • Absolutely one of the . She explains everything VERY well.
  • Not very good at explaining concepts so that one will gain a .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • I had to work my ass off to earn B in her class.
  • as if it were an .
  • tons of hw, and the test were so hard, even if you did study
  • shes super hard! and shes not linient at all.

Theme 3

📝 About Exams

  • She gives you only !
  • and timed, no study guides!
  • No equation sheets allowed for tests.
  • and are a big part of your grade.

Theme 4

👍

  • If you are interested in actually learning the material, Pender is the way to go.
  • , but really not necessary for an engineering person.
  • if you come with the rigth attitude you will do perfectly fine in her class.
  • IF YOU'RE NOT GOOD AT MATH.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

50

Recent reviews read by the AI

85

Lifetime ratings

88/100

Evidence confidence

Fifty in-person reviews over many years give rich, , and teaching style.

Inside 50 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 519
4 out of 517
3 out of 513
2 out of 518
1 out of 518

Course coverage

MATH42510 reviews
MATH6110 reviews
MATH259 reviews
MATH4106 reviews
MATH4202 reviews
Show 11 more courses
MATH65A2 reviews
MATH65B2 reviews
CALC21 review
CALCULUS65B1 review
MAT611 review
MATH19281 review
MATH4211 review
MATH61A1 review
MATH751 review
MATH97851 review
PRECAL1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values