AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

D Guthrey

STAT10 · MATH425 · MATH25 · STATS10 · MATH2574075 · MATH410 · MATH401 · 22 lifetime ratings

AI rating
12/100
RMP rating
1.7/5
Take again
0%
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

unless you are already strong in math and can teach yourself most of the course.

Best fit · Self Taught ProConfusing lecturesRushed pacingHard testsSelf-teaching requiredNice but ineffective
  • Most students say he rushes through material and .
  • as hard, broad, and inconsistent with homework.
  • A few students say easy math classes are manageable if you already understand the material.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Getting an A usually requires strong self-teaching because tests are hard and .

All evidence is from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

Some lower math courses are described as inherently easy, but his rushed and .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they consistently say his delivery increases difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Reviews do not prove a , but students say going to class alone often does not help enough.

In-person comments mention attending class and workshops, while no online evidence exists.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

10/100

Students overwhelmingly do not recommend him because , and poor preparation for tests.

All and is strongly negative.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Some students mention fairness or support center consideration, but and failed or dropped outcomes dominate.

Format shift

and test outcomes.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Students report a ton of , and .

Format shift

In-person reviews repeatedly describe heavy effort outside class.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Most reviews describe unclear explanations, rushed pacing, poor answers to questions, and .

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

85/100

Reviews , and test mismatch with homework.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

22 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are strongly negative, , and heavy self-teaching.

Main concern

and lectures do not prepare them well for exams.

What students said

“ . if you value your GPA or want to learn.”
STAT10
“ and inconsistent with homework.”
MATH25
“You have to teach your self. !!!!”
MATH410

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The cover too much material and do not match homework well.

Hard TestsBroad Exam CoverageHomework-Test MismatchRushed Pre-Exam Material

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and poor alignment with homework, but do not clearly prove proctoring or open-book policy.

Hard TestsBroad Exam CoverageHomework-Test MismatchRushed Pre-Exam Material
“Sometimes he covers a lesson RIGHT before an .”
STAT10
“ and covered too much material.”
STAT10
“ and inconsistent with homework.”
MATH25

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Don't take him unless you have no other choice! everything fully.”

Voice snapshots generated from 22 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“He is very confusing, I wouldn't take a hard class with him such stats or college algebra.”

🚫 Recommendation Risk

10/100

“ if you value your GPA or want to learn.”

🧪

25/100

“ and covered too much material.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • .
  • He would rush into lessons and .
  • Never asks if we have any questions. Does not give enough examples. Bad teacher.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • there was a ton of homework, and the
  • and inconsistent with homework.
  • I went to the Success Center 3 times a week and to every workshop and ...and I still failed.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Taking the Class

  • You have to teach your self. !!!!
  • Don't waste your money, pick another professor!
  • if you are not a math person I because he does rush the sections and moves too fast

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

22

Recent reviews read by the AI

22

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Twenty-two reviews across many years show a strong and detailed pattern of the same teaching and .

Inside 22 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 52
3 out of 54
2 out of 56
1 out of 510

Course coverage

MATH256 reviews
MATH4015 reviews
MATH4104 reviews
STAT103 reviews
4101 review
Show 3 more courses
MATH25740751 review
MATH4251 review
STATS101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

6 reported outcomes

A range

2

A 2

B range

1

B 1

C range

1

C 1

D range

1

D+ 1

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Drop/Withdrawal 1