AI Rate Professor

Accounting

Kevin Erdkamp

ACCTC102 · ACCT101C · ACCTG1B · ACCTG1A · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
41/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.8

The decision

if you can handle heavy independent study and want accounting practice more than an easy grade.

Best fit · Effort For RewardTime IntensiveMixed TeachingSelf-Study HeavyGood FoundationOnline Overload
  • Online feedback is extremely negative, with one student reporting impossible weekly workload.
  • In-person reviews are mixed, ranging and .
  • The course can reward committed students but is not a reliable easy A.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

, but other comments stress serious time, energy, and self-study.

Online evidence is much harsher, while serious commitment.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

Accounting concepts are manageable for some, but and heavy workload make the course challenging.

, while in-person reviews are mixed but still require effort.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

60/100

One in-person review says not to miss class, but reviews .

; the online review does not address attendance policy.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

but warn away students seeking clarity, low workload, or an easy A.

, while in-person evidence depends on the student's independence and goals.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

45/100

The limited grade evidence includes one A, but comments .

Format shift

, while the online review reports a D despite major time investment.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

Workload ranges from tedious in-person homework to an online review claiming 30 or more hours per week.

Format shift

Online workload appears overwhelming, while but not always difficult.

Teaching experience

Average

45/100

Some students praise the foundation, but , and .

Format shift

Online teaching experience is very negative, while .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

30/100

Reviews emphasize online homework and studying more than exams, with .

Format shift

Both formats mention workload more than exams, though the online review gives little assessment detail.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are mixed, with some students finding value and others struggling with clarity and organization.

Main concern

Students may need to learn much of the material independently.

What students said

“a serious commitment of time and energy is required to learn the material.”
ACCT101C
“If you are up to learning most of the material on your own then this is the class to take”
ACCTG1B

Remote format

Online

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The single online review describes an overwhelming workload and poor outcome.

Main concern

The online class was described as impossible and .

What students said

“Literally 30+ hours of work each week.”
ACCTC102
“ .”
ACCTC102

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book policy, or .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, proctoring, open-book policy, or final structure.

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Online

The online review does not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book policy, or .

Reviews Do Not Clearly Prove Exam Policy

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“If you are up to learning most of the material on your own then this is the class to take... if .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

45/100

“he's not very good at explaining and getting a concept across.”

📚 Workload Pressure

25/100

“Literally 30+ hours of work each week.”

👍 Recommendation Fit

42/100

“If you need to learn the material to move forward into more advanced accounting courses then his course will be a great foundation.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Kevin Erdkamp is a great Financial Accounting instructor.
  • he could be a board

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Outside the class I didn't have to do much studying and it was a relatively easy A.
  • a serious commitment of time and energy is required to learn the material.
  • This class was IMPOSSIBLE.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

62/100

Evidence confidence

Five reviews include detailed workload and teaching comments, but they are old and split sharply by format.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ACCTG1B2 reviews
ACCT101C1 review
ACCTC1021 review
ACCTG1A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values