AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Sandra Freeman

NUR2526 · ADNADNU · ADN20 · ADN25 · ADN11 · 5 lifetime ratings

AI rating
45/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.2

The decision

if you can handle tough clinical expectations and a potentially uneven support experience.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerDemanding Clinical InstructorFavoritism ConcernsCritical Thinking HeavyHelpful When Supportive
  • Reviews are sharply split between students who found her caring and students who felt overlooked.
  • The course experience appears difficult, with tests described as random and .
  • Concerns about favoritism are the main reason recommendation strength is low.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Getting an A appears to require strong mastery and critical thinking, with no evidence of grade cushioning.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

The material is described as demanding, test-heavy, and .

Only in-person reviews exist, so course difficulty is based entirely on classroom and clinical comments.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

, and there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Recommendation depends heavily on whether students feel supported or affected by favoritism.

All recommendation evidence is from in-person reviews, with no online comparison.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

25/100

Tests are described as random and difficult, with no comments suggesting lenient grading.

Format shift

and tests.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

The workload is not detailed, but the expected level of preparation and .

Format shift

no online evidence.

Teaching experience

Average

55/100

Some students call her helpful and caring, while others report mistakes, forgetfulness, and favoritism.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and they are highly mixed.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

85/100

Student comments mainly discuss tests and .

Format shift

evidence.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

5 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews describe a demanding instructor whose helpfulness varies by student experience.

Main concern

Several students report favoritism and .

What students said

“Need to know your stuff! She expects you to have a .”
ADN25
“ ”
ADNADNU
“Very helpful and cares alot about her students”
ADN20

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews suggest difficult, book-based tests with a strong critical thinking focus, but .

Book-Based TestsRandom TestsCritical Thinking Heavy

Assessment risk

Strict

30/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

book and a need for thorough understanding.

Book-Based TestsRandom TestsCritical Thinking Heavy
“ but mostly from the book.”
NUR2526
“She is huge on critical thinking.”
ADN25

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Need to know your stuff! She expects you to have a .”

Voice snapshots generated from 5 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, fairness, and difficulty. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

55/100

“Very helpful and cares alot about her students unlike some of the other instructors!!”

⚠️ Student Experience

42/100

“ ”

📚 Course Difficulty

25/100

“Need to know your stuff! She expects you to have a .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She's amazing!! I loved being my clinical instuctor!!
  • She's a and helpful!!

Theme 2

📈

  • but mostly from the book.
  • She expects you to have a .

Theme 3

⚖️ About Fairness

  • she definitely shows favoritism to those in her clinical group.
  • for those of us but not denied

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

5

Recent reviews read by the AI

5

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Five older but praise and serious concerns.

Inside 5 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ADN111 review
ADN201 review
ADN251 review
ADNADNU1 review
NUR25261 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values