AI Rate Professor

Political Science

Noah Dormady

PS1 · PUBAF3000 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
17/100
RMP rating
1.5/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

unless you already know the subject and can tolerate a demanding, unsupportive class.

Best fit · Self Taught ProNot beginner friendlyCondescending toneHigh difficultyPoor teaching
  • Students strongly criticize his teaching style and classroom tone.
  • The course is difficult for students without prior knowledge.
  • Comments describe a .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

The class appears hard to pass comfortably because he expects students to already understand the material.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

25/100

Students say the course assumes prior knowledge and becomes difficult quickly for beginners.

.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly .

There is no online evidence, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Students advise against taking him because they see him as , and unfriendly to beginners.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

30/100

Grading is not directly described, but the high difficulty and .

Format shift

Only in-person comments inform this judgment.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Workload is not detailed, but the course feels heavy because students must bring significant prior knowledge.

Format shift

, and workload details are limited.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Students describe him as condescending, biased in presentation, and incapable of teaching effectively.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly describe whether .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

teaching and little support for beginners.

Main concern

Students say he expects prior knowledge and does not teach effectively.

What students said

“He is arrogant and condescending -- incapable of actually teaching.”
PUBAF3000
“ if you are new to the subject!”
PS1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly describe .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam policy

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ if you are new to the subject!”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting teaching quality, difficulty, and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“He is arrogant and condescending -- incapable of actually teaching.”

📈 Course Difficulty

25/100

“He expects you to know everything already.”

👍 Recommendation Level

18/100

“ if you are new to the subject!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Never related class to real life except his own skewed views.
  • He is arrogant and condescending -- incapable of actually teaching.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Readiness

  • if you are new to the subject!
  • He expects you to know everything already.
  • Many students dropped within 2-4 weeks!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

42/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is low because there are only two older reviews, though both are strongly negative and consistent.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

PS11 review
PUBAF30001 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values