AI Rate Professor

Physics

Lawrence Lim

PHYS30A · 1 lifetime ratings

AI rating
50/100
RMP rating
2.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you want a demanding physics class and can tolerate rough teaching for a .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerVery difficultWeak connectionStrong curveSkill-buildingNew teacher
  • The only review describes him as very difficult and hard to relate to.
  • The class may build analytical and problem-solving skills despite a poor teaching experience.
  • A , but the workload and difficulty still seem high.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

45/100

The , but the course still sounds demanding and not like an easy A.

All grade-effort evidence comes from one in-person review, with no online evidence.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The class is described as very difficult but intellectually useful for problem solving.

, and it describes the course as difficult.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The review .

, and it does not clearly prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

45/100

The review criticizes his teaching but notes a and meaningful skill gains.

All recommendation evidence comes from one in-person review, with no online evidence.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

72/100

despite high course difficulty.

Format shift

, and it clearly cites a .

Workload

Heavy

30/100

The workload and challenge appear heavy because the class is described as very difficult.

Format shift

Only one in-person review exists, and .

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

The review says he was hard to relate to and new to teaching, though the class built useful skills.

Format shift

All teaching evidence comes from one in-person review, with no online comparison.

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

The review mentions grading and a curve but .

Format shift

Only one in-person review exists, and .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

1 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

The single in-person review says the class is very difficult, poorly connected to students, but .

Main concern

Teaching quality and student connection appear weak from the .

What students said

“Very difficult teacher and can hardly relate to the students.”
PHYS30A
“ .”
PHYS30A

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

The or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very difficult teacher and can hardly relate to the students.”

Voice snapshots generated from 1 review, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“Very difficult teacher and can hardly relate to the students.”

⚖️

72/100

“ .”

🧠 Learning Value

45/100

“You will differently feel smarter after coming out of this class and be more analytical and a better problem solver.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Very difficult teacher and can hardly relate to the students.
  • he is new to teaching (first semester) so I can understand why he couldn't relate.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Many things to complain about but .
  • You will differently feel smarter after coming out of this class and be more analytical and a better problem solver.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

1

Recent reviews read by the AI

1

Lifetime ratings

25/100

Evidence confidence

, so the analysis has limited reliability despite a .

Inside 1 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PHYS30A1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values