AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Lillian Torres

NURS13 · NURAD13 · ADN13 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
37/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.5

The decision

unless you can tolerate weak communication and rely mostly on your own support system.

Best fit · Self Taught ProExperiencedPoor communicationAbrasive toneMixed classroom energyLow recommendation
  • Students acknowledge her experience and some humor, but the overall tone is negative.
  • The biggest issue is communication style, with multiple reviews calling her rude or non-approachable.
  • Difficulty is not the main problem; student treatment and professionalism are.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

60/100

The class does not sound academically brutal, but poor communication may make earning a strong grade less predictable.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

65/100

Difficulty ratings are moderate to low, but the learning experience is weakened by communication problems.

, so no online comparison is possible.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The reviews do not clearly .

and no online reviews exist.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

32/100

because they describe poor communication and rude treatment.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

50/100

, so grading appears neither clearly lenient nor harsh.

Format shift

and they focus more on communication than grading.

Workload

Moderate

60/100

The course does not sound workload-heavy, but comments .

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Poor

48/100

Her subject experience is noted, but communication and student treatment are repeatedly criticized.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

50/100

Reviews do not clearly identify whether .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

but repeated concern about rude or ineffective communication.

Main concern

Students repeatedly criticize her communication and classroom tone.

What students said

“I liked her, but .”
ADN13
“she doesn't know how to communicate with students”
NURS13
“Abrasive, non-approachable”
NURS13

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove exam format, proctoring, open-book rules, or .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam policy

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

or .

Reviews do not clearly prove exam policy

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She seems like a , but it is time to retire..hang up the hat and enjoy the rest of her life.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, communication, and recommendation. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“She made psych interesting, along with the amazing clinical instructors.”

👍 Recommendation Rate

32/100

“I liked her, but .”

⚠️ Communication Issues

30/100

“For someone who teaches "therapeutic communication" she doesn't know how to communicate with students.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Professor Torres is hilarious.
  • she definitely knows her stuff.
  • She made psych interesting

Theme 2

⚠️ About Communication

  • she doesn't know how to communicate with students.
  • No manners.
  • Abrasive, non-approachable

Theme 3

📉 About Recommendation

  • I liked her, but .
  • she is just plain rude and talks to students like they're six years old and dumb.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

45/100

Evidence confidence

, though their concerns about communication are consistent.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 50

Course coverage

NURS132 reviews
ADN131 review
NURAD131 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values