AI Rate Professor

Mathematics

Karen Pendor

MATH410 · MATH25 · MATH425 · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
10/100
RMP rating
1.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
5.0

The decision

unless you are already strong in math and can learn independently.

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor ExplanationsImpatientUnhelpful Office HoursHarsh TestsAvoid
  • All three reviews rate her teaching very poorly and difficulty very high.
  • Students say she demonstrates math without explaining it clearly.
  • Comments describe impatience, weak support, and poor student connection.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

12/100

Getting an A appears very hard because every review , and poor support.

All evidence comes from in-person math reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

BrainBurner

10/100

The math content feels much harder because students say examples .

Only in-person reviews exist, and they consistently describe very high difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews .

All evidence is in person, but comments do not prove an .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

5/100

Students strongly discourage taking her because , and unhelpful.

Only in-person reviews exist, and all three strongly advise against the class.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

12/100

Reviews mention poor test performance and no willingness to help improve grades.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

25/100

The workload is not clearly described, but the learning burden is heavy because students feel unsupported in difficult math courses.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews exist, and they focus .

Teaching experience

Awful

12/100

Students consistently describe her teaching as , and unsupportive.

Format shift

All and is uniformly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

85/100

The clearest assessment evidence points to tests, with no meaningful assignment structure described.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews mention assessments.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews , and little useful support.

Main concern

Students .

What students said

“ .”
MATH425
“She has office hours but .”
MATH410
“only connects with fast learners”
MATH25

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because students report poor test outcomes, but reviews do not clearly prove the .

Difficult TestsNo Clear Exam Policy

Assessment risk

Strict

25/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but do not clearly prove format, proctoring, or open-book policy.

Difficult TestsNo Clear Exam Policy
“gets annoyed that most of the class does ”
MATH25

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“I would strongly suggest someone else.”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, support, and difficulty. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

12/100

“ .”

🚫 Recommendation Risk

5/100

“I would strongly suggest someone else.”

📈 Difficulty and Support

12/100

“Will not work with you to improve grade”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Horrible teaching strategy.
  • She seems like she is only there to demonstrate her skills in Math.
  • shows no interest in students' grasping the material

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty and Grades

  • Will not work with you to improve grade
  • gets annoyed that most of the class does
  • only connects with fast learners

Theme 3

❤️ About Character

  • When asked a questions she treats you as if you are dumb.
  • She seems very impatient
  • makes rude,hurtful comments.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

, but they are detailed and completely consistent in their negative assessment.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 53

Course coverage

MATH251 review
MATH4101 review
MATH4251 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values