AI Rate Professor

Nursing

Mariana Catiessanu

NURV111 · NURVN402 · NURVN405L · 3 lifetime ratings

AI rating
82/100
RMP rating
4.0/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.3

The decision

She appears best for nursing students who want fair early-semester guidance and practical clinical support.

Best fit · Beginner FriendlyFirst-semester supportFair clinical instructorCare plan guidanceAvailable help
  • Students describe Catiessanu as fair, available, and helpful for early nursing students.
  • Her strongest evidence is practical support with care plans and clinical guidance.
  • The review base is very small and spread across old dates, so confidence is limited.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

68/100

Students describe fair support rather than an easy grade, so success likely depends on doing the clinical work.

.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

70/100

Her guidance appears beginner-friendly, especially for care plans and first-semester nursing expectations.

Only in-person reviews exist, so there is no online comparison.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

The reviews .

No format-specific attendance .

Is this professor recommended?

WorthIt

78/100

Students recommend her mainly because , and helpful when needed.

Recommendation evidence .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

68/100

One review explicitly calls her very fair, but there is not .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

The reviews mention care plans and clinical work but do not describe an unusually light or heavy workload.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss course demands.

Teaching experience

Good

80/100

Students describe her as helpful, fair, available, and useful for first-semester nursing learning.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

The clearest assessment-related evidence is care plan work and clinical performance support rather than exams.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

3 reviews

Low confidence · Best fit for Beginner Friendly

as fair, available, and useful for first-semester nursing support.

Main concern

The evidence is positive but sparse, with only three reviews.

What students said

“Great instructor to have in first semester.”
NURV111
“Very fair instructor, encourages you to excel and helps when needed”
NURVN402

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

policy or format.

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Very fair instructor, encourages you to excel and helps when needed, floats the floors and .”

Voice snapshots generated from 3 reviews, highlighting key themes in beginner support, clinical guidance, and fairness. Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Support

80/100

“Great instructor to have in first semester.”

🩺 Clinical Guidance

78/100

“floats the floors and .”

📝 Care Plan Help

70/100

“She is the one actually start teaching me as a first semester student how to do care plan!”

Theme 1

👩‍⚕️ About Nursing Support

  • Great instructor to have in first semester.
  • She is the one actually start teaching me as a first semester student how to do care plan!
  • Very fair instructor, encourages you to excel and helps when needed

Theme 2

⚖️ About Fairness

  • Very fair instructor, encourages you to excel and helps when needed
  • helps when needed, floats the floors and .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

3

Recent reviews read by the AI

3

Lifetime ratings

38/100

Evidence confidence

Only , though their comments are mostly consistent and specific.

Inside 3 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

NURV1111 review
NURVN4021 review
NURVN405L1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values