AI Rate Professor

History

William Cuddihy

HIST17 · HISTORY17 · HIST18 · HIS17 · 7 lifetime ratings

AI rating
45/100
RMP rating
3.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

if you like history, can read heavily, and are ready for .

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerKnowledgeable but demandingHeavy readingChallenging examsMixed teaching clarityCurved grades
  • some call him excellent and others say he is hard to understand.
  • , and keeping up without much note structure.
  • Exams are described as challenging, but at least one review mentions a curve.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

35/100

An A is possible, but students and studying, and exams are challenging.

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The material becomes difficult because students must read heavily, study hard, and .

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

45/100

Reviews suggest class participation and keeping up are important, but they .

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

58/100

Students who enjoy demanding history instruction recommend him, while and too hard.

All and is polarized.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

52/100

One student mentions a curve, but multiple reviews describe the class and exams as hard.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

28/100

Students repeatedly say they must read the book, study, and handle demanding exams.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Average

56/100

Positive reviews praise his knowledge and passion, but negative reviews say he is hard to understand and gives poor notes.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnExams

78/100

Comments emphasize tests and .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

7 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are polarized, praising his knowledge and humor while warning that , and .

Main concern

Students must read and study seriously because exams and lectures can be difficult to follow.

What students said

“ .”
HIST18
“you have to READ the book and STUDY.”
HIST17
“Talks all class doesn't give notes.”
HIS17

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Exams are described as challenging and reading-based, but reviews do .

Challenging ExamsHeavy Reading RequiredNo Clear Proctoring Evidence

Assessment risk

Standard

42/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

but do not clearly prove exam rules or proctoring.

Challenging ExamsHeavy Reading Required
“ .”
HIST18
“you have to read the whole book and hope that you know what he is talking the next day and on test.”
HIS17

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“One of the . He is so knowledgeable. .”

Voice snapshots generated from 7 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching, workload, and exams. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

56/100

“He loves what he teaches.”

📚 Workload Demand

28/100

“you have to READ the book and STUDY.”

🧪

42/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • He loves what he teaches.
  • He is so knowledgeable.
  • Talks all class doesn't give notes.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • .
  • He's toooooooooo hard.

Theme 3

📚

  • you have to READ the book and STUDY.
  • you have to read the whole book and hope that you know what he is talking the next day and on test.
  • Just put in some work and you should be ok

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

7

Recent reviews read by the AI

7

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because 7 older reviews give consistent difficulty signals but sharply mixed teaching opinions.

Inside 7 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 53
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 50
1 out of 52

Course coverage

HIST183 reviews
HISTORY172 reviews
HIS171 review
HIST171 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values