AI Rate Professor

Economics

Chris Styles

ECON01 · ECON1 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
39/100
RMP rating
2.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if and uneven teaching for a relatively easy economics class.

Best fit · Self Taught ProMixed Teaching QualityMandatory AttendanceEasy QuizzesWasted Class TimeMotivation Needed
  • Reviews and very poor classroom management.
  • Students describe , and easy quizzes.
  • The course seems not very hard, but several students found the class time frustrating.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

80/100

Low difficulty ratings and comments calling quizzes and with limited academic difficulty.

All .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

Students describe the class as easy to understand, though one says it is not so easy.

Only in-person reviews exist, and they give mixed but mostly manageable difficulty evidence.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

10/100

Several reviews say students had to attend almost daily or every day.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Some students liked the , but others strongly warned against the class because .

Recommendation and is sharply mixed.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

78/100

Tests and quizzes are described as very easy, but there is .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

55/100

Academic work sounds easy, but , and quizzes add time cost.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Average

48/100

and lectures described as useless or frustrating.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

Balanced

60/100

Reviews mention group assignments, quizzes, and tests, so assessment appears .

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

and two strong negatives about class value and attendance.

Main concern

and group work may feel wasteful to some students.

What students said

“She helped me really understand economics.”
ECON01
“YOU HAD TO BE AT CLASS EVERYDAY WHICH WAS A WASTE OF TIME AND LIFE.”
ECON1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Comments describe tests and quizzes as very easy, but reviews .

Easy TestsEasy QuizzesPolicy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

82/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and quizzes easy but do not clearly prove book, proctoring, webcam, or closed-book rules.

Easy TestsEasy QuizzesPolicy Not Clearly Proven
“Her tests and quizes are absolute jokes.”
ECON1
“quizes(cake, and a waste of time i might add).”
ECON1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She helped me really understand economics.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and grading. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

48/100

“Class not so easy - but easy to understand teacher.”

📅

10/100

“YOU HAD TO BE AT CLASS EVERYDAY WHICH WAS A WASTE OF TIME AND LIFE.”

📈 Grade Effort

80/100

“Her tests and quizes are absolute jokes.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She helped me really understand economics.
  • Class not so easy - but easy to understand teacher.
  • Honestly, you get almost nothing from her lectures

Theme 2

📅

  • YOU HAD TO BE AT CLASS EVERYDAY WHICH WAS A WASTE OF TIME AND LIFE.
  • forced to attend classes almost daily because of " and quizes(cake, and a waste of time i might add).
  • She does not want to waste your time, so don't waste hers.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

58/100

Evidence confidence

but highly polarized evidence with no online coverage.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 51
1 out of 51

Course coverage

ECON13 reviews
ECON011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values