AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Ken Koningshoffer

PSYCH6887 · PSYCH0000 · PSYCH1 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
45/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.3

The decision

if and tolerate uneven teaching and grading policies.

Best fit · Self Taught ProBoring lecturesHarsh grading structureCostly textbookMixed test policies
  • Students describe weak classroom engagement and .
  • because category .
  • One older review , but all authoritative reviews are counted as in person.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

45/100

Getting an A looks inconsistent because while another says one bad category can damage the .

All though two comments mention taking the class online.

Is the course easy?

Standard

52/100

The content itself sounds manageable, but poor pacing, limited coverage, and boring lectures make learning harder.

review evidence.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

, but leaving early or skipping could hurt journal completion and learning.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Depends

42/100

Students are split, but the stronger pattern warns , and textbook cost.

The , while no authoritative online review set exists.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

28/100

One review says the despite strong total performance.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Workload is not described as huge, but , and a required textbook create some pressure.

Format shift

.

Teaching experience

Poor

42/100

Students often describe boring delivery, weak coverage, and poor engagement despite one positive online-style experience.

Format shift

In-person comments drive the score because the authoritative online review count is zero.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Assessment appears to include tests and journals .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

but leans negative, with complaints about boredom, weak coverage, and .

Main concern

Students may need to learn outside class and .

What students said

“Very difficult teacher.”
PSYCH0000
“Overall Boring but I passed.”
PSYCH6887
“He is not the .”
PSYCH1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

because one review reports repeatable tests and final, while another reports harsh category-based grading.

Repeatable Tests ReportedCategory-Based GradingPolicy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and , but do not clearly prove proctoring, open-book, or closed-book rules.

Repeatable Tests ReportedCategory-Based GradingFinal Mentioned
“The tests are pretty simple, they're not too specific, and and over -- EVEN THE FINAL!”
PSYCH1
“Class grade not dependent on total score but average score from 6 categories.”
PSYCH0000

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ .”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and cost. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

42/100

“He is not the .”

⚖️

28/100

“You get a bad grade in the class.”

💸 Course Cost

35/100

“Also, makes you buy the book that he published. COSTLY!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • Overall Boring but I passed.
  • He is not the .
  • Wonderful professor, took a class of his online and it wasn't one of those horrible online classes you hear about!

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • Very difficult teacher.
  • You get a bad grade in the class.
  • The tests are pretty simple, they're not too specific, and and over -- EVEN THE FINAL!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

56/100

Evidence confidence

Four older reviews give some detail but conflict sharply and include no recent evidence.

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 50
2 out of 53
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PSYCH12 reviews
PSYCH00001 review
PSYCH68871 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values