AI Rate Professor

Chemistry

Howard Goldman

CHEM101 · CHEM21 · 4 lifetime ratings

AI rating
31/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
3.5

The decision

unless you can learn independently and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProHard To UnderstandFair GradingUnhelpful Lab SupportMixed OrganizationAvoidable
  • Students repeatedly criticize communication, helpfulness, and lab support.
  • Some reviews , and fair with .
  • The overall experience is negative despite a few fair assessment comments.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

52/100

Grades may be fair and notes , but poor support can make earning a strong grade harder.

All evidence is from in-person chemistry reviews, with no online evidence.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

35/100

and limited help.

Only in-person reviews describe the course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly state an .

, and there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

30/100

because he is hard to understand and .

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

64/100

Several comments call grading fair, including willingness to return points when disputes are convincing.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

50/100

Reviews mention quizzes and lab work but do not clearly describe an unusually heavy workload.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss coursework, and workload detail is limited.

Teaching experience

Poor

34/100

Students report that he is , and cuts lab time short.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

62/100

Assessment appears to include quizzes and a , but exact weighting is not described.

Format shift

and a ; no online assessment evidence exists.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

4 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, with , and .

Main concern

Students may struggle because explanations and help are reported as weak.

What students said

“At first it's hard to understand him, but he does know what he is talking about.”
CHEM21
“He if we had questions, and he was not very friendly.”
CHEM21

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The clearest exam evidence is student-friendly because and the .

Open Notes QuizzesFair Lab Final

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

72/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

In-person reviews mention sometimes hard quizzes with notes allowed and a fair lab final, but .

Open Notes QuizzesFair Lab Final
“ , but you can use notes.”
CHEM21
“ .”
CHEM21

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ because he does not let you have the full three hours to do the lab, and he doesn't know how to answer your questions about what to do.”

Voice snapshots generated from 4 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

34/100

“He if we had questions, and he was not very friendly.”

⚖️

64/100

“ and if there is a dispute you can talk to him about it”

📝

72/100

“ , but you can use notes.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • At first it's hard to understand him, but he does know what he is talking about.
  • Nobody listens to him.
  • He if we had questions, and he was not very friendly.

Theme 2

⚖️

  • and if there is a dispute you can talk to him about it
  • , but you can use notes.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

4

Recent reviews read by the AI

4

Lifetime ratings

55/100

Evidence confidence

Four older reviews provide mixed but mostly consistent evidence of weak teaching and .

Inside 4 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 50
3 out of 51
2 out of 51
1 out of 52

Course coverage

CHEM213 reviews
CHEM1011 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values