AI Rate Professor

Music

Thomas Dedobay

MUSIC12 · MUSIC51A · MUSICHISTORY · MUSIC4 · MUSICAPP · MUS4 · MUSIC2B · MU4 · MUSIC2A · MUSIC30 · MUSIC · ELECMUS · MUSIC2AAND2B · 31 lifetime ratings

AI rating
30/100
RMP rating
2.4/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.4

The decision

unless you are comfortable self-teaching, attending every class, and dealing with .

Best fit · Self Taught ProBoring lecturesUnorganized teachingStrict attendanceConfusing examsMixed grading
  • Many students say lectures are boring, unfocused, and .
  • , and missing class or .
  • Some students found him nice or easy, but the dominant pattern is poor teaching clarity and frustration.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

55/100

Some students call him an easy A if you show up and , but , and low grades despite effort.

, and those reviews conflict on how easy the grade is.

Is the course easy?

Standard

48/100

The subject can be manageable, but , and mismatched tests make it feel harder than expected.

Only in-person reviews describe the course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

8/100

Multiple reviews say attendance is checked, stressed, or heavily counted in the grade.

.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

28/100

because they found the class boring, unclear, unorganized, and frustrating.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Strict

34/100

comments offset by complaints about harsh penalties and unclear expectations.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

52/100

The workload is not always large, but concert reports, memorization, listening, tests, and .

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Poor

36/100

Most detailed reviews describe him as boring, scattered, unclear, and or knowledgeable.

Format shift

.

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Grades appear to combine exams, listening or terms, concert reports, attendance, and performance tasks depending on the course.

Format shift

Assessment .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

31 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are heavily mixed but lean negative, with repeated complaints about boring , and .

Main concern

Students often felt they learned little in class and had to guess what mattered for exams or reports.

What students said

“Run away from this teacher, as fast as you can.”
MUSIC4
“I learned more from searching the internet.”
MUSIC12
“he checks attendence everyday and it is a lot off your grade if you don't show”
MUSIC30

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

, but comments suggest tests can be poorly aligned with lectures and strict when missed.

Three ExamsFinal PerformanceStrict Attendance Around TestsUnclear Test Coverage

Assessment risk

Varies

38/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, and a , but do not clearly prove open-book, closed-book, webcam, or proctoring policies.

Three ExamsFinal PerformanceUnclear Test Coverage
“memorize the list of terms he gives for the 3 exams”
MUS4
“sing 2 songs front of class.”
MUSIC
“ ”
MUSIC2A

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“Run away from this teacher, as fast as you can.”

Voice snapshots generated from 31 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and assessments. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

36/100

“His method of teaching has no real focus, it seems as though he stands in front of the class and drones on about various topics for an hour and a half.”

🚪 Recommendation Risk

28/100

“ !”

📌

8/100

“he checks attendence everyday and it is a lot off your grade if you don't show”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • bad teacher very scatter brained very random.
  • Nice guy but, doesn't teach very well.
  • He was a as if he was learning along with us.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • it might be boring but it's not hard getting an A
  • ... I GOT A D.. even though i attended every class and did the work.
  • One gramatical error, and u go down to a B.

Theme 3

🧾

  • Had to write 2 concert reports with requirements that he never taught.
  • prepare to cram.
  • Never ever be late or miss a test! There is no mercy.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

31

Recent reviews read by the AI

31

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

The 31 reviews cover many years and courses, with repeated detailed patterns about attendance, organization, boredom, and grading.

Inside 31 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 55
4 out of 53
3 out of 56
2 out of 56
1 out of 511

Course coverage

MUSIC48 reviews
MUSIC4 reviews
MUSIC303 reviews
MUS42 reviews
MUSIC122 reviews
Show 8 more courses
MUSIC2A2 reviews
MUSIC2B2 reviews
MUSIC51A2 reviews
MUSICAPP2 reviews
ELECMUS1 review
MU41 review
MUSIC2AAND2B1 review
MUSICHISTORY1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

1

A 1

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values