AI Rate Professor

Interior Design

L. Rubenstein

ID10 · ID21 · IDID10 · 8 lifetime ratings

AI rating
10/100
RMP rating
2.1/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.1

The decision

Avoid this professor unless you and heavy projects.

Best fit · Self Taught ProFast LecturesUnclear AssignmentsHarsh ToneHeavy ProjectsInconsistent Grading
  • and limited help.
  • Assignments are seen as hard, time-consuming, and inconsistently graded.
  • The dominant advice is to avoid the class despite one positive review.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

MissionImpossible

18/100

Getting an A appears very hard because and .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Challenging

28/100

The course content feels harder because lectures are rushed and .

Only in-person reviews describe the course challenge.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do .

Only in-person reviews exist, and .

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Students overwhelmingly recommend avoiding her because , and unhelpful.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Students report inconsistent grading and and unpredictable.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

18/100

Assignments and projects are described as extremely hard and time-consuming.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Most students , and a condescending classroom tone.

Format shift

, and they are strongly negative.

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

20/100

Comments focus on assignments, projects, books, and lectures rather than exams.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss assessment, with no online comparison.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

8 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, , and heavy work.

Main concern

Students , and condescending.

What students said

“she goes through notes way and what she expects from students.”
ID10
“ and !”
ID21
“I don't like asking questions because she makes you feel stupid for asking.”
IDID10

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do not clearly prove the .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format or .

Exam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“DO NOT TAKE HER CLASS! she goes through notes way and what she expects from students.”

Voice snapshots generated from 8 reviews, highlighting key themes in teaching and grading. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“ .”

⚖️

15/100

“Says one thing in class and grades you on a other.”

📚 Workload Pressure

18/100

“ and !”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She gives notes very fast, and often outdated.
  • Rushes through lessons.
  • She is very dry and boring.

Theme 2

⚖️

  • and what she expects from students.
  • Says one thing in class and grades you on a other.
  • expects you to spend a ridiculous amount of .

Theme 3

💬 About Classroom Treatment

  • Talks down to students, and shows no interest in even being there!
  • Makes people feel stupid when they ask questions.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

8

Recent reviews read by the AI

8

Lifetime ratings

82/100

Evidence confidence

Eight detailed in-person reviews over several years show a consistent negative pattern, though the data is old.

Inside 8 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 51
4 out of 50
3 out of 52
2 out of 53
1 out of 52

Course coverage

ID104 reviews
ID213 reviews
IDID101 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values