AI Rate Professor

Earth Science

Leigh Dudash

EARTHSCIENCE · ESCLAB1 · ESC1L · ESC1LAB · ESLAB · SCIENEART · ESC1 · 9 lifetime ratings

AI rating
15/100
RMP rating
1.6/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
4.0

The decision

unless you can teach yourself and .

Best fit · Self Taught ProPoor explanationsHarsh gradingBusy workUnfair grading concernsAvoid strongly
  • Most students describe the teaching as , and frustrating.
  • Several reviews accuse grading of being harsh, unfair, or based on personal feelings.
  • One positive review , but it is outweighed by repeated negative experiences.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

30/100

One student says doing all assignments can lead to an A, but and unexpected low scores.

because there are no online reviews.

Is the course easy?

Challenging

30/100

The course feels difficult because students say , and they must figure things out alone.

because there are no online reviews.

Is attendance flexible?

Varies

50/100

Reviews do not clearly describe the .

because there are no online reviews.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

18/100

Most students warn others away because of , and unhelpful teaching.

All because there are no online reviews.

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

Multiple students say she grades very hard, gives bad grades on busy work, or grades based on personal feelings.

Format shift

.

Workload

Heavy

30/100

, and busy work that feel excessive for a lab.

Format shift

All .

Teaching experience

Awful

20/100

Most comments , and leaves students to figure out difficult work alone.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

12/100

Reviews focus on assignments, projects, maps, models, and busy work, with .

Format shift

All .

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

9 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Self Taught Pro

In-person reviews are mostly negative, , and perceived unfair grading.

Main concern

Students repeatedly complain that and grades harshly or unfairly.

What students said

“she bad at teaching bad at explaining she is not helpfull”
EARTHSCIENCE
“ feelings”
ESC1
“ !!!!”
ESCLAB1

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews do , and the course appears mainly assignment- and project-based.

No Clear Exam PolicyAssignment-Based Assessment

Assessment risk

Varies

55/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

format, but they repeatedly mention assignments, maps, projects, and models.

No Clear Exam PolicyAssignment-Based Assessment
“she allowed you to work in groups for all assignments.”
ESLAB
“She grades super hard on the maps.”
ESC1L

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“ feelings, is not truthful about her grading”

Voice snapshots generated from 9 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: Medium.

🎯 Teaching Quality

20/100

“she bad at teaching bad at explaining she is not helpfull”

⚖️

15/100

“She is the feelings instead of what you deserve.”

📚 Workload

30/100

“Gives bad grades on busy work.”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • feelings, is not truthful about her grading
  • she bad at teaching bad at explaining she is not helpfull
  • DOES NOT HELP ANY OF HER STUDENTS.

Theme 2

⚖️

  • She grades super hard on the maps.
  • she grades on personal feelings instead of what you deserve.
  • Very fair, if you do all assignments you could easy come out with an A!

Theme 3

⚠️ About Student Warnings

  • !
  • !!!!
  • she is horible run for your life!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

9

Recent reviews read by the AI

9

Lifetime ratings

66/100

Evidence confidence

Credibility is medium because , but some comments are vague or emotionally extreme.

Inside 9 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50
4 out of 51
3 out of 51
2 out of 52
1 out of 55

Course coverage

ESC1L2 reviews
ESCLAB12 reviews
EARTHSCIENCE1 review
ESC11 review
ESC1LAB1 review
Show 2 more courses
ESLAB1 review
SCIENEART1 review

Reported outcomes

No letter grade reported results lead the reported letter grades.

1 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

1

Incomplete 1