AI Rate Professor

English

Emily Skaftun

ENGL1B · ENG1A · ENG1B · ENGL1 · 15 lifetime ratings

AI rating
87/100
RMP rating
4.2/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.7

The decision

if you want a fair , and careful writing are rewarded.

Best fit · Effort For RewardFair GraderReading RequiredHelpful FeedbackNo TestsEssay Focused
  • Students describe her as passionate, helpful, and fair when they complete the reading and essays.
  • The class is not a free A, but most students say effort and following directions lead to a good grade.
  • Workload centers on reading, discussion, and .

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

FairEffort

72/100

A good grade is realistic if students read, attend, follow directions, and write carefully, but it is not a .

All evidence comes from in-person reviews, with .

Is the course easy?

Beginner

69/100

The content is approachable for English composition, but , and .

All course .

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

55/100

Attendance is not clearly described as mandatory, but students say going to class and .

and discussion expectations.

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

86/100

Most students strongly recommend her because , and teaches students who put in effort.

Recommendation .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Fair

68/100

as fair and manageable when students follow directions, but citation mistakes and .

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

57/100

Daily reading, questions, discussion, and several essays create consistent work, though many students say it is manageable.

Format shift

Workload .

Teaching experience

Excellent

86/100

Students , and good at giving feedback, despite a few complaints about teaching style.

Format shift

Teaching .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

22/100

Grades , and essays rather than exams.

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

15 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews consistently describe a fair, reading-and-essay-heavy class with strong teaching and .

Main concern

Students who dislike reading or .

What students said

“Her teaching and .”
ENG1A
“This is a very easy class if you do the work.”
ENG1A
“ .”
ENG1B

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews explicitly mention no tests and easy take-home quizzes, making the assessment style student-friendly.

No TestsTake-Home QuizzesEssay Based

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

88/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

tests and take-home reading quizzes.

No TestsTake-Home Quizzes
“ !!”
ENG1A
“Gives out take home quiz's for .”
ENGL1

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“This is a very easy class if you do the work.”

Voice snapshots generated from 15 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and exams. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

86/100

“She is a good professor!”

⚖️

68/100

“Her teaching and .”

📚 Workload Reality

57/100

“ .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • she is extremely passionate about literature and it really shows.
  • Always gave good feed back and told you where you could improve.
  • .

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • This is a very easy class if you do the work.
  • if you follow directions.
  • If you're looking for a teacher that is just and pass with an "A", then don't take her class.

Theme 3

📝 About Workload

  • Only had to write 3-4 papers.
  • .

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

15

Recent reviews read by the AI

15

Lifetime ratings

86/100

Evidence confidence

Fifteen reviews across several years give consistent , and assessment style.

Inside 15 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 59
4 out of 53
3 out of 52
2 out of 51
1 out of 50

Course coverage

ENG1A11 reviews
ENG1B2 reviews
ENGL11 review
ENGL1B1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values