Elizabeth Parks

ENG550 · ENG405 · ENG450 · ENGENG · 12 lifetime ratings

AI rating: 15/100
RMP rating: 1.5/5
Take again: —
Difficulty: 3.9

The decision

Avoid this professor unless , and heavy in-class participation.

Best fit · Hardcore LearnerHarsh essay gradingUnorganized lecturesConfusing feedbackMandatory participationAvoid strongly

Students overwhelmingly describe the class as , and disorganized.
as harsh and critical.
Attendance and participation matter, but students do not describe them as helping learning much.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

HardWork

28/100

Getting an A appears difficult because and , and participation matter.

All .

Is the course easy?

Standard

42/100

The English content itself may be normal, but and harsh essay expectations make the class feel difficult.

Only in-person reviews describe the course difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Mandatory

12/100

and participation are important requirements.

Is this professor recommended?

Avoid

12/100

Students because the , and frustrating.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Harsh

15/100

as very harsh, critical, and unforgiving.

Format shift

Workload

Moderate

48/100

The workload does not sound massive, but , and .

Format shift

Only in-person reviews discuss workload.

Teaching experience

Awful

18/100

Students consistently describe her as , and unhelpful despite sometimes being nice.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

FocusOnAssignments

25/100

Assessment appears centered on essays and .

Format shift

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

12 reviews

High confidence · Best fit for Hardcore Learner

In-person reviews are strongly negative, , and required attendance or participation.

Main concern

The and disorganized teaching.

What students said

“ .. attendance is a huge thing in this class make sure your always there and always participate.”
ENG450

“ .”
ENG450

“if you don't want to be .”
ENG550

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

Reviews focus on essays and participation, and they do .

Essay-Based AssessmentExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

Assessment risk

Varies

50/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

, but do not clearly prove exam style, open-book rules, or proctoring requirements.

Essay-Based AssessmentExam Policy Not Clearly Proven

“ ..”
ENG450

“grades hard on essays, only 4 a sem., but easy on other assignmnets.”
ENGENG

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice
“if you don't want to be .”
Voice snapshots generated from 12 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and recommendation risk. Credibility rating: High.

🎯 Teaching Quality

18/100

“Totally scatterbrained. Loses her train of thought easily.”

⚖️

15/100

“ ..”

🚫 Recommendation Level

12/100

“Last word Dont do it!!!”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

Totally scatterbrained. Loses her train of thought easily.
.
she is horrible and all over the place she dosnt know how to clarify anything

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

grades very harshly so always pay attention
so in other words dont mess up
grades hard on essays, only 4 a sem., but easy on other assignmnets.

Theme 3

⚠️ About Recommendation

!!
Stay away from this professor.
!!

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

Recent reviews read by the AI

Lifetime ratings

78/100

Evidence confidence

, though they are older and some are emotionally worded.

Inside 12 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 50

4 out of 50

3 out of 53

2 out of 53

1 out of 56

Course coverage

ENG4508 reviews

ENG5502 reviews

ENG4051 review

ENGENG1 review

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

No reported values

B range

No reported values

C range

No reported values

D range

No reported values

F

No reported values

No letter grade reported

No reported values

Elizabeth Parks

Avoid this professor unless x x x x x x x, and heavy in-class participation.

Four answers before you build your schedule.

HardWork

Standard

Mandatory

Avoid

See how this professor fits your week.

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

In person

Online

See what students actually said.

🎯 Teaching Quality

⚖️ x x

🚫 Recommendation Level

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

⚠️ About Recommendation

See exactly what the AI read.

Quality ratings

Course coverage

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

A range

B range

C range

D range

F

No letter grade reported

Avoid this professor unless , and heavy in-class participation.

⚖️