AI Rate Professor

Psychology

Erika Grova-Silva

PSYCH55 · 2 lifetime ratings

AI rating
94/100
RMP rating
4.8/5
Take again
—
Difficulty
2.0

The decision

if you want a and are willing to keep good notes and study the textbook.

Best fit · Effort For RewardHelpful teacherInteresting lecturesReal-world experienceExtra creditOpen-book final
  • Students describe her as thorough, helpful, and engaging.
  • The course , and an .
  • An A seems realistic with good notes and textbook study, plus support.

Key questions

Four answers before you build your schedule.

Is this an easy A?

EasyA

78/100

The class is not a free A, but good notes, textbook study, and make a strong grade very reachable.

All Easy A evidence comes from two in-person PSYCH55 reviews.

Is the course easy?

Beginner

68/100

The material is manageable because she is helpful and engaging, though diagnosing and .

, and both describe manageable difficulty.

Is attendance flexible?

Recommended

58/100

as mandatory, but taking good notes in class appears important for success.

Only in-person reviews mention class notes, with .

Is this professor recommended?

MustTake

92/100

Students recommend her because , and makes abnormal psychology interesting.

All .

Course guide

See how this professor fits your week.

Grading

Lenient

75/100

and an , though tests still require textbook mastery.

Format shift

.

Workload

Moderate

62/100

The workload includes PowerPoint lectures, films, short papers, notes, textbook study, a midterm, and a final.

Format shift

Only in-person reviews describe workload.

Teaching experience

Excellent

92/100

Students describe her as thorough, helpful, engaging, and able to connect professional experience to class material.

Format shift

All .

Assessment method

Balanced

58/100

Assessment blends short papers, a , and an .

Format shift

.

Luni fit check

Weigh these signals against your actual schedule.

Get help balancing workload, grading, and timing when no option is an obvious fit.

Course format

Compare the in-person and online experience.

Classroom format

In person

2 reviews

Medium confidence · Best fit for Effort For Reward

In-person reviews are strongly positive, praising helpful teaching, practical experience, and a fair assessment mix.

Main concern

because study guides are not provided.

What students said

“She made abnormal psych even more interesting than it already is.”
PSYCH55
“She is very thorough and helpful.”
PSYCH55
“She doesn't provide study guides so taking diligent notes as well as mastering diagnosing by using the text book is important.”
PSYCH55

Remote format

Online

0 reviews

Low confidence

No stored summary is available for this format.

Main concern

No main concern is stored for this format.

Exam style

Know what to expect from exams and major assignments.

The , while and require preparation.

Open-Book FinalMidterm MentionedTextbook-Based Tests

Assessment risk

StudentFriendly

86/100

Low score means less forgiving assessment conditions.

In person

and textbook-based tests, with no evidence of strict proctoring.

Open-Book FinalMidterm MentionedTextbook-Based Tests
“Class was power , and .”
PSYCH55
“ .”
PSYCH55

Online

Student evidence

See what students actually said.

Top student voice

“She is very thorough and helpful.”

Voice snapshots generated from 2 reviews, highlighting key themes in , and . Credibility rating: Low.

🎯 Teaching Quality

92/100

“She made abnormal psych even more interesting than it already is.”

📘 Grade Support

78/100

“She also gives opportunity for .”

📝

86/100

“Class was power , and .”

Theme 1

👨‍🏫 About Teaching Style

  • She made abnormal psych even more interesting than it already is.
  • She is very thorough and helpful.
  • She is a practicing MFT and she brings her experience into the classroom.

Theme 2

📈 About Difficulty & Grades

  • If need the textbook.
  • She also gives opportunity for .
  • .

Theme 3

📝

  • Class was power , and .
  • She doesn't provide study guides so taking diligent notes as well as mastering diagnosing by using the text book is important.

Data context

See exactly what the AI read.

Analysis sample

2

Recent reviews read by the AI

2

Lifetime ratings

46/100

Evidence confidence

The two reviews are detailed and consistent, but the sample size is very small and old.

Inside 2 stored ratings

Quality ratings

5 out of 52
4 out of 50
3 out of 50
2 out of 50
1 out of 50

Course coverage

PSYCH552 reviews

Reported outcomes

A range results lead the reported letter grades.

0 reported outcomes

A range

0

No reported values

B range

0

No reported values

C range

0

No reported values

D range

0

No reported values

F

0

No reported values

No letter grade reported

0

No reported values